Abstract:Background: Intermittent catheterisation is a commonly recommended procedure for people with incomplete bladder emptying. There are now several designs of intermittent catheter (e.g. different lengths, 'ready to use' presentation) with different materials (e.g. PVC-free) and coatings (e.g. hydrophilic). The most frequent complication of intermittent catheterisation is urinary tract infection (UTI), but satisfaction, preference and ease of use are also important to users. It is unclear which catheter designs, techniques or strategies affect the incidence of UTI, which are preferable to users and which are most cost effective. Objectives: To compare one type of catheter design versus another, one type of catheter material versus another, aseptic catheterisation technique versus clean technique, single-use (sterile) catheters versus multiple-use (clean) catheters, self-catheterisation versus catheterisation by others and any other strategies designed to reduce UTI and other complications or improve user-reported outcomes (user satisfaction, preference, ease of use) and cost effectiveness in adults and children using intermittent catheterisation for incomplete bladder emptying. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Register, which contains trials identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, and handsearching of journals and conference proceedings (searched 30 September 2013), the reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings, and we attempted to contact other investigators for unpublished data or for clarification. Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or randomised cross-over trials comparing at least two different catheter designs, catheterisation techniques or strategies. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors assessed the methodological quality of trials and abstracted data. For dichotomous variables, risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were derived for each outcome where possible. For continuous variables, mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each outcome. Because of trial heterogeneity, it was not always possible to combine data to give an overall estimate of treatment effect. Main results: Thirty-one trials met the inclusion criteria, including 13 RCTs and 18 cross-over trials. Most were small (less than 60 participants completed), although five trials had more than 100 participants. There was considerable variation in length of follow-up and definitions of UTI. Participant dropout was a problem for several trials, particularly where there was long-term follow-up to measure incidence of UTI. Fifteen trials were more than 10 years old and focused mainly on comparing different catheterisation techniques (e.g. single versus multiple-use) on clinical outcomes whereas, several more recent trials have focused on comparing different types of catheter designs or materials, especially coatings, and user preference. It was not possible to combine data from some trials owing to variations in the catheters tested and in particular the catheter coatings. Where there were data, confidence intervals around estimates were wide and hence clinically important differences in UTI and other outcomes could neither be identified nor reliably ruled out. No study assessed cost-effectiveness. Authors' conclusions: Despite a total of 31 trials, there is still no convincing evidence that the incidence of UTI is affected by use of aseptic or clean technique, coated or uncoated catheters, single (sterile) or multiple-use (clean) catheters, self-catheterisation or catheterisation by others, or by any other strategy. Results from user-reported outcomes varied. The current research evidence is weak and design issues are significant. More well-designed trials are strongly recommended. Such trials should include analysis of cost-effectiveness because there are likely to be substantial differences associated with the use of different catheter designs, catheterisation techniques and strategies.

Comparison of the preventive effect of urethral cleaning versus disinfection for catheter associated urinary tract infections in adults: A network meta-analysis.

Effect of different disinfectants on preventing asymptomatic bacteriuria and catheter-related urinary tract infection: a network meta-analysis

Effectiveness of Silver-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters for Preventing Catheter-Related Blood Stream Infections: a Meta-Analysis.

Effect of urinary catheter removal on different occasions after Cesarean section on urinary complications:a network meta-analysis

Study on the bladder irrigation of patients with indwelling urethral catheter

Systematic Review: Antimicrobial Urinary Catheters To Prevent Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection in Hospitalized Patients

Nursing Effect Analysis of Urinary Tract Infections in Urology Surgery Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Different Types of Catheters for Intermittent Self-Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

The Incidence of Urinary Tract Infection of Different Routes of Catheterization Following Gynecologic Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparison of silver alloy catheter with standard catheter in preventing urinary tract infection: a meta-analysis

Prophylactic Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infections after Urodynamic Studies: A Meta-Analysis.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Complications Including Infectious and Bleeding Events in Adult Haemodialysis Patients: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters for clean intermittent catheterization: a meta-analysis to determine their capacity in reducing urinary tract infections

Efficacy and safety of preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infection by inhibiting catheter bacterial biofilm formation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial

WITHDRAWN: Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management

Efficacy of Polyvidone Iodine on Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection in Patients with Indwelling Catheter

A New Method Prevents Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection by Inhibiting Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Catheters in Catheterized Patients

Prevention of urinary tract infection using a silver alloy hydrogel-coated catheter in critically ill patients: A single-center prospective randomized controlled study