Prognostic Value of EGFR and KRAS in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Shi-Ming Zhang,Qing-Ge Zhu,Xiao-Xiao Ding,Song Lin,Jing Zhao,Lei Guan,Ting Li,Bing He,Hu-Qin Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s167578
2018-01-01
Cancer Management and Research
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The prognostic value of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been reported. However, conflicting results were reported in these studies. The effect of mutations in these two genes in resected NSCLC remains controversial.METHODS:We searched Internet databases for studies reporting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in resected NSCLC patients with EGFR or KRAS mutations. A meta-analysis calculating the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for DFS and OS was used to measure the association of EGFR or KRAS mutations with the prognosis of patients after surgery.RESULTS:A total of 9,635 patients from 32 studies were included in this analysis. The combined HR for EGFR mutations on DFS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.66-0.90, p=0.001) and on OS was 0.72 (95% CI 0.66-0.80, p<0.00001). In addition, the combined HR for KRAS mutations on DFS was 1.5 (95% CI 1.15-1.96, p=0.002) and on OS was 1.49 (95% CI 1.28-1.73, p<0.00001). Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis, and bias analysis proved the stability of the results.CONCLUSION:The analysis showed that EGFR mutations were significantly associated with DFS and OS. These findings indicated that surgically treated NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations were inclined to exhibit a prolonged DFS and OS. In addition, the results indicated that KRAS mutations predicted worse DFS and OS in patients with resected NSCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?