Abstract:BackgroundTo assess the prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin on overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.MethodsStudies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Survival data were extracted from eligible studies to compare overall survival in patients with a positive circumferential resection margin with patients having a negative circumferential resection margin according to the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) criteria and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria. Survival data were pooled with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model meta-analysis on overall survival was performed.ResultsThe pooled HRs for survival were 1.510 (95% CI, 1.329–1.717; p < 0.001) and 2.053 (95% CI, 1.597–2.638; p < 0.001) according to the RCP and CAP criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients with T3 stage disease according to the RCP (HR, 1.381; 95% CI, 1.028–1.584; p = 0.001) and CAP (HR, 2.457; 95% CI, 1.902–3.175; p < 0.001) criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy according to the RCP (HR, 1.676; 95% CI, 1.023–2.744; p = 0.040) and CAP (HR, 1.847; 95% CI, 1.226–2.78; p = 0.003) criteria, respectively.ConclusionsPositive circumferential resection margin is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with T3 stage disease and patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. To assess the prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin on overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Studies were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Survival data were extracted from eligible studies to compare overall survival in patients with a positive circumferential resection margin with patients having a negative circumferential resection margin according to the Royal College of Pathologists (RCP) criteria and the College of American Pathologists (CAP) criteria. Survival data were pooled with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A random-effects model meta-analysis on overall survival was performed. The pooled HRs for survival were 1.510 (95% CI, 1.329–1.717; p < 0.001) and 2.053 (95% CI, 1.597–2.638; p < 0.001) according to the RCP and CAP criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients with T3 stage disease according to the RCP (HR, 1.381; 95% CI, 1.028–1.584; p = 0.001) and CAP (HR, 2.457; 95% CI, 1.902–3.175; p < 0.001) criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin was associated with worse survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy according to the RCP (HR, 1.676; 95% CI, 1.023–2.744; p = 0.040) and CAP (HR, 1.847; 95% CI, 1.226–2.78; p = 0.003) criteria, respectively. Positive circumferential resection margin is associated with poor prognosis in patients with esophageal cancer, particularly in patients with T3 stage disease and patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Prognostic Value of Circumferential Resection Margin in T3N0M0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Prognostication and Optimal Criteria of Circumferential Margin Involvement for Esophageal Cancer after Chemoradiation and Esophagectomy

Prognostic Significance of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of circumferential resection margin status on survival and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Incidence, Predictors and Prognostic Implications of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study in a Chinese High-Volume Cancer Center.

The prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients without neoadjuvant treatment

Time-dependent prognostic impact of circumferential resection margin in T3 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The Circumferential Resection Margin is a Prognostic Predictor in Colon Cancer.

Prognostic Improvement of Reexcision for Positive Resection Margins in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Characteristics And Prognostic Significance Of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin In Rectal Cancer

Circumferential Resection Margin As a Prognostic Factor after Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Large Population-Based Retrospective Study.

Occurrence and prognostic value of circumferential resection margin involvement for patients with rectal cancer

Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement in patients of rectal cancer

Postchemoradiotherapy Pathologic Stage Classified by the American Joint Committee on the Cancer Staging System Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Analysis of risk factors for positive circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer

Clinical significance of preoperative CALLY index for prognostication in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing surgery

Prognostic significance of involvement of the circumferential resection margin/surface in patients with pancreatic head cancer: A prospective evaluation of pancreatoduodenectomy specimens using the 0 and 1mmrules

Prognostic factors for survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with a complete regression of the primary tumor (ypT0) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by surgery

Clinical and Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Neutrophil-Monocyte Ratio on Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients

Clinical Significance of Risk Stratification of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation and Surgery

The Value of Preoperative Glasgow Prognostic Score and the C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio As Prognostic Factors for Long-Term Survival in Pathological T1N0 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma