Abstract:BACKGROUND:Distraction osteogenesis can be used to treat hemifacial microsomia in patients of any age group. Application of three-dimensional (3D) technology in the surgical planning of distraction osteogenesis allows the placement of an intraoral distractor to define the cutting line and help predict the outcome of surgery.AIM:This study compared the results of distraction osteogenesis performed, using computer-assisted surgery, on OMENS-plus-classified M2A, M2B, and M3 type patients. Comparisons were in terms of either accuracy or predictability.METHODS:40 patients were selected to participate in the 8-month study. Preoperative image data from 3D-CT scans of the 40 patients were translated into DICOM format 3D cephalometrics, run using the computer software MIMICS version 18, and based on eight reference anatomical landmark points, five lines of measurement, and the midline of the mandibular plane. The distraction vector for the affected side of mandible was selected and the elongation process simulated repeatedly until satisfactory results were obtained. The surgical guide was created using CAD/CAM-RP technology. The distraction osteogenesis procedure was then performed using the surgical guides. Follow-up for all patients continued until 8 months postoperatively. Accuracy with and without computer-assisted surgery was assessed linearly and volumetrically. Simple mean comparisons and paired t-tests were conducted using IBM SPSS V21.RESULTS:In those patients who received computer-assisted surgery, distraction in the M2A type mandible showed accuracy of around 97.77% ± 7.92% (p > 0.05) for height and 97.91% ± 10.23% (p > 0.05) for length of the mandible. Meanwhile, the M2B type mandible presented accuracy of around 93.85% ± 8.07% (p > 0.05) for height and 95.85% ± 10.16% (p > 0.05) for length. For the M3 type mandible accuracy was around 98.42% ± 6.58% (p > 0.05) for height and 97.14% ± 11.45% (p > 0.05) for length. These measurements showed no significant differences between preoperative design and real outcome.CONCLUSIONS:Individualized guides improve the accuracy of distraction osteogenesis. They help the surgeon to identify the mandibular defect and ensure the desired outcome after the operation.

The Accuracy of Virtual-Surgical-planning-assisted Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia in Adult Patients: Distraction Osteogenesis Vs. Orthognathic Surgery.

Simultaneous correction of bilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with mandibular micrognathia using internal distraction osteogenesis and 3-dimensional craniomaxillofacial models.

Comprehensive Consideration and Design with the Virtual Surgical Planning-Assisted Treatment for Hemifacial Microsomia in Adult Patients.

Computer-Assisted Distraction Osteogenesis In The Treatment Of Hemifacial Microsomia

Computer-assisted Surgery in Therapeutic Strategy Distraction Osteogenesis of Hemifacial Microsomia: Accuracy and Predictability.

Integrating Virtual Surgical Planning and 3D-Printed Tools with Iliac Bone Grafts for Orbital and Zygomatic Reconstruction in Hemifacial Microsomia Patients

Error Analysis of a CAD/CAM Method for Unidirectional Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in the Treatment of Hemifacial Microsomia.

Accuracy of a CAD/CAM surgical template for mandibular distraction: a preliminary study.

Hemifacial Microsomia Treated with a Hybrid Technique Combining Distraction Osteogenesis and a Mandible-Guided Functional Appliance: Pilot Study.

Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning in Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery: Comparison of Planned and Actual Results.

[Surgical Management of Hemifacial Microsomia: a Report of 24 Cases].

Accuracy and Safety of Robotic Navigation-Assisted Distraction Osteogenesis for Hemifacial Microsomia

Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning in Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis Using Distraction Osteogenesis: Comparison of Planned and Actual Results.

Feasibility of a Robot-Assisted Surgical Navigation System for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Hemifacial Microsomia: A Model Experiment

Comprehensive Treatment Approach for Hemifacial Microsomia: Integrating Orthognathic Surgery with Sequential Customized Implantation

Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review

Application of Virtual Planning for Three-Dimensional Guided Maxillofacial Reconstruction of Pruzansky-Kaban III Hemifacial Microsomia Using Custom Made Fixation Plate.

Combined Bimaxillary Distraction Osteogenesis Associated with Orthognathic Surgery for Hemifacial Microsomia in Adults

Treatment of Dentofacial Deformities Secondary to Osteochondroma of the Mandibular Condyle Using Virtual Surgical Planning and 3-Dimensional Printed Surgical Templates.

Bimaxillary Orthognathic Approach to Correct Skeletal Facial Asymmetry of Hemifacial Microsomia in Adults

S7B-07 SESSION 7B: HFM ROBIN - PART II EARLIER DISTRACTION FOR HEMIFACIAL MICROSOMIA CONTRIBUTES TO COMPENSATORY MAXILLARY GROWTHc EARLY RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER PROSPECTIVE STUDY