Interferon-based Treatment is Superior to Nucleos(t)ide Analog in Reducing HBV-related Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients at High Risk

Peipei Ren,Zhujun Cao,Ruidong Mo,Yuhan Liu,Lichang Chen,Ziqiang Li,Tianhui Zhou,Jie Lu,Yunye Liu,Qing Guo,Rong Chen,Huijuan Zhou,Xiaogang Xiang,Wei Cai,Hui Wang,Shisan Bao,Yumin Xu,Honglian Gui,Qing Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2018.1518423
2018-01-01
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Abstract:Background: The effect of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) versus interferon (IFN) on the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is controversial. We assessed whether antiviral strategy affected HCC development in CHB patients at different HCC risks.Methods: 1112 CHB patients with antiviral therapy were included in this retrospective study. Patients treated with NAs only were classified into NAs group (n=682) while those received IFN treatment with or without NAs were defined as IFN group (n=430). Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize baseline differences.Results: Totally, 31 patients developed HCC during follow-up (median 5.41years). The cumulative HCC incidence at 10years was significantly lower in the IFN group than NAs group (2.7% vs 8.0%, p<0.001). Similar results were obtained in the PSM-cohort. Patients with IFN-based treatment were less likely to develop HCC than those with NAs (Hazard ratio=0.15; 95% CI 0.04-0.66; p=0.012). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that this superiority of IFN in reducing HCC development was obvious in patients at high- but not low-risk of HCC.Conclusions: Reduction of HCC development was more significant in CHB patients at higher HCC risk with IFN-based therapy than NAs treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?