Abstract:Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) combine agronomic or plant growth models with gridded spatial input data to estimate spatially explicit crop yields and agricultural externalities at the global scale. Differences in GGCM outputs arise from the use of different biophysical models, setups, and input data. GGCM ensembles are frequently employed to bracket uncertainties in impact studies without investigating the causes of divergence in outputs. This study explores differences in maize yield estimates from five GGCMs based on the public domain field-scale model Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) that participate in the AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison initiative. Albeit using the same crop model, the GGCMs differ in model version, input data, management assumptions, parameterization, and selection of subroutines affecting crop yield estimates via cultivar distributions, soil attributes, and hydrology among others. The analyses reveal inter-annual yield variability and absolute yield levels in the EPIC-based GGCMs to be highly sensitive to soil parameterization and crop management. All GGCMs show an intermediate performance in reproducing reported yields with a higher skill if a static soil profile is assumed or sufficient plant nutrients are supplied. An in-depth comparison of setup domains for two EPIC-based GGCMs shows that GGCM performance and plant stress responses depend substantially on soil parameters and soil process parameterization, i.e. hydrology and nutrient turnover, indicating that these often neglected domains deserve more scrutiny. For agricultural impact assessments, employing a GGCM ensemble with its widely varying assumptions in setups appears the best solution for coping with uncertainties from lack of comprehensive global data on crop management, cultivar distributions and coefficients for agro-environmental processes. However, the underlying assumptions require systematic specifications to cover representative agricultural systems and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the interlinkage of parameter sensitivity from various domains such as soil parameters, nutrient turnover coefficients, and cultivar specifications highlights that global sensitivity analyses and calibration need to be performed in an integrated manner to avoid bias resulting from disregarded core model domains. Finally, relating evaluations of the EPIC-based GGCMs to a wider ensemble based on individual core models shows that structural differences outweigh in general differences in configurations of GGCMs based on the same model, and that the ensemble mean gains higher skill from the inclusion of structurally different GGCMs. Although the members of the wider ensemble herein do not consider crop-soil-management interactions, their sensitivity to nutrient supply indicates that findings for the EPIC-based sub-ensemble will likely become relevant for other GGCMs with the progressing inclusion of such processes.

Multimodel Ensembles Improve Predictions of Crop–environment–management Interactions

Effectiveness of Using Representative Subsets of Global Climate Models in Future Crop Yield Projections

Using ensemble-mean climate scenarios for future crop yield projections: a stochastic weather generator approach

Evaluation of Crop Model Prediction and Uncertainty Using Bayesian Parameter Estimation and Bayesian Model Averaging

The Impact of Climate Change on China's Crop Production: A CMIP5 Ensemble Assessment

The Optimization of Model Ensemble Composition and Size Can Enhance the Robustness of Crop Yield Projections

On the Use of Machine Learning Based Ensemble Approaches to Improve Evapotranspiration Estimates from Croplands Across a Wide Environmental Gradient

Exploring uncertainties in global crop yield projections in a large ensemble of crop models and CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate scenarios

Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble

A Multiple Crop Model Ensemble for Improving Broad-Scale Yield Prediction Using Bayesian Model Averaging

Improving multiple model ensemble predictions of daily precipitation and temperature through machine learning techniques

Multi-model ensembles for ecosystem prediction

Strong Regional Influence of Climatic Forcing Datasets on Global Crop Model Ensembles

Optimization of Multi-Ecosystem Model Ensembles to Simulate Vegetation Growth at the Global Scale

Contribution of crop model structure, parameters and climate projections to uncertainty in climate change impact assessments

Why is there so much variability in crop multi-model studies?

AgMIP-Wheat Multi-Model Simulations on Climate Change Impact and Adaptation for Global Wheat

New Approaches for the Assimilation of LAI Measurements into a Crop Model Ensemble to Improve Wheat Biomass Estimations

Multi-model ensembles for regional and national wheat yield forecasts in Argentina

Uncertainties in global crop model frameworks: effects of cultivar distribution, crop management and soil handling on crop yield estimates

Multi-model Evaluation of Phenology Prediction for Wheat in Australia