Smoking and Performance on Simulated Firefighting Tasks
R. Fowler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.1989.68.3C.1302
1989-06-01
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Abstract:Many employers today are encouraging their employees who smoke tobacco to quit and are refusing to hire smokers for new positions, citing health insurance costs and disability payments as prime reasons for such personnel policies. In some physically demanding occupations, it may also be true that nonsmokers actually outperform smokers on some job tasks, making tobacco use a predictor of value in developing a criterion-related validity model. This question was explored as part OF a study to validate a set of physical fitness requirements in the selection of firefighters. A sample of 114 male (age M = 23.7 yr., SD = 4.7) and 4 female (M = 27.8 yr., SD = 7.6) firelighter recruits at a state fire college in the southeast were measured under standardized conditions on both a battery of physical fitness tasks and, after firefighter training, on a set of five job-related tasks derived from task analyses to be critical to successful job performance. Each criterion task was quantified by recording the length of time (in minutes) required to complete it. Tasks were performed sequentially in the same order without pausing while wearing full pmtective gear and demand-breathing apparatus; the total time to complete the sequence of five tasks served as the major criterion. The predictor measures were taken during the f i s t day of the basic 200-hr. firefighter training course, and performance on the criterion tasks was determined on the last day of the course, 33 days later. Smokers (n = 43) and nonsmokers (n = 75) did not differ significantly in performance on tasks which required mostly upper arm scrength in a relatively stationary stance, such as raising a ladder, pulling a hose, and chopp~ng open a door. However, nonsmokers (M = 1.45, SD = .68) took significantly less time than smokers IN = 1.78, SD = .98) to carry a standpipe hose load up Four flights of stairs (t,,, = 2.13, p = .035), and nonsmokers (M = 2.41, SD = 1.51) required less time than smokers (M = 3.43, SD = 2.84) to complete the simulated rescue of a 117-lb dummy from the fifth story of a building (t,,, = 2.56, p = .012). Since these five tasks were done sequentially, the smokers (M = 6.96, SD = 4.00) also took about 27% longer than did the nonsmokers (M = 5.46, SD = 2.70) to perform the total evolution ( t , , , = 2.42, p = .017). To the extent that tasks involving moving a heavy object through a distance while wearing protective gear under conditions where less oxygen 1s available for breathing are a part of successful job performance, then the cobacco-smokmg behavior of an applicant may be a significant factor in the validity of decisions in selecting employees.