Efficacy of Pemetrexed and Carboplatin with or Without Bevacizumab in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with EGFR Non-T790m Mutations after Progression on First-Line EGFR-tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Zhansheng Jiang,Yu Zhang,Yinli Yang,Zhensong Yue,Zhanyu Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.12814
IF: 3.223
2018-01-01
Thoracic Cancer
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (PC + B) versus pemetrexed and carboplatin (PC) in lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR non-T790M mutations after progression on first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).METHODS:Patients with EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma who had received second-line PC with or without bevacizumab harboring EGFR non-T790M mutations after progression on first-line EGFR-TKIs between April 2015 and 2017 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and secondary endpoints were overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety.RESULTS:A total of 85 patients were eligible for the study: 55 and 30 cases were enrolled in the PC and PC + B groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was prolonged with PC + B compared to PC (median 8.2 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.037). The objective response rate was improved with PC + B compared to PC (46.7% vs. 25.5%; P = 0.047) and overall survival prolonged with PC + B compared to PC (median 26.3 vs. 19.2 months; P = 0.012). Safety was similar to previous studies of bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: one patient experienced grade 3 hypertension and proteinuria but did not require the discontinuation of therapy.CONCLUSION:The addition of bevacizumab to PC was superior to PC alone as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-T90M EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma. However, this result needs to be confirmed by prospective clinical trials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?