Abstract:The selection of a data processing method for use in mass spectrometry-based label-free proteome quantification contributes significantly to its accuracy and precision. In this study, we comprehensively evaluated 7 commonly-used label-free quantification methods (MaxQuant-Spectrum count, MaxQuant-iBAQ, MaxQuant-LFQ, MaxQuant-LFAQ, Proteome Discoverer, MetaMorpheus, TPP-StPeter) with a focus on missing values, precision, accuracy, selectivity, and reproducibility of low abundance protein quantification in both single shot and fractionation. Our results showed that among the tested strategies, MaxQuant in MaxLFQ mode outperformed other strategies in terms of accuracy and precision in both whole proteome and low abundance proteome quantification, whereas the Proteome Discoverer (PD) strategy using SEQUEST as a search engine performed better in terms of quantifiable low abundance proteome coverage. We subsequently applied the PD and MaxLFQ strategies in a blood proteomic dataset and found that many FDA-approved tumor prognostic biomarkers could be identified as well as quantified using the PD strategy, indicating the potential advantage of PD in label-free quantification studies. These results provide a reference for method choice in label-free quantification data analysis. SIGNIFICANCE: Mass spectrometry-based label-free quantification methods play an important role in label-free proteome data analysis. In this study, we evaluated 7 commonly-used label-free quantification methods with respect to the following aspects: missing values, precision, accuracy, selectivity, and reproducibility for low abundance protein quantification. The results showed that, among the strategies evaluated, the PD strategy with SEQUEST as a search engine performed better in terms of low abundance protein coverage. This study provides a reference for method choice in label-free quantification data analysis.

A Dimethyl-Labeling-Based Strategy For Site-Specifically Quantitative Chemical Proteomics

A Simplified and Ultrafast Pipeline for Site-Specific Quantitative Chemical Proteomics.

Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification strategies.

Improvement Of The Quantification Accuracy And Throughput For Phosphoproteome Analysis By A Pseudo Triplex Stable Isotope Dimethyl Labeling Approach

Quantitative Chemoproteomic Profiling with Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Mass Spectrometry

Site-specific Quantitative Cysteine Profiling with Data-Independent Acquisition-Based Mass Spectrometry

Quantitative Site-Specific Chemoproteomic Profiling of Protein Lipoylation.

A fully automated system with online sample loading, isotope dimethyl labeling and multidimensional separation for high-throughput quantitative proteome analysis.

Amino Acid Residue Specific Stable Isotope Labeling for Quantitative Proteomics

Peptide- and Protein-Level Combined Strategy for Analyzing Newly Synthesized Proteins by Integrating Tandem Orthogonal Proteolysis with Cleavable Bioorthogonal Tagging

A new sample preparation method for the absolute quantitation of a target proteome using (18)O labeling combined with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry

Target Identification with Quantitative Activity Based Protein Profiling (ABPP)

Site-Specific Activity-Based Protein Profiling Using Phosphonate Handles

A Systematic N-terminal Peptide Quantitative Labeling Strategy for Differential Proteomic Analysis.

Method to Study Stoichiometry of Protein Post-Translational Modification.

Quantitative Label-Free Phosphoproteomics Strategy for Multifaceted Experimental Designs

Functionalizing tandem mass tags for streamlining click-based quantitative chemoproteomics

Enhancing Comprehensive Analysis of Newly Synthesized Proteins Based on Cleavable Bioorthogonal Tagging.

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Protein Quantification Using Isotope TMPP-labeled Peptides

Maleic Anhydride Labeling-Based Approach for Quantitative Proteomics and Successive Derivatization of Peptides

Site-Specific Quantification of Protein Ubiquitination on MS2 Fragment Ion Level Via Isobaric Peptide Labeling