Abstract:Abstract The human genome contains around 800 C2H2 Zinc Finger Proteins (ZFPs), and many of them are composed of long tandem arrays of zinc fingers. Current motif prediction models assume longer finger arrays correspond to longer DNA-binding motifs and higher specificity. However, recent experimental efforts to identify ZFP binding sites in vivo contradict this assumption, with many having short motifs. Here, we systematically test how multiple zinc fingers contribute to binding for three model ZFPs: Zinc Finger Y (ZFY), CTCF, and ZNF343. Using ZFY, which contains 13 fingers, we quantitatively characterize its binding specificity with several methods, including Affinity-seq, HT-SELEX, Spec-seq and fluorescence anisotropy, and find evidence for ‘dependent recognition’ where downstream fingers can recognize some extended motifs only in the presence of an intact core site. For the genomic insulator CTCF, additional high-throughput affinity measurements reveal that its upstream specificity profile depends on the strength of the core, violating presumed additivity and positionindependence. Moreover, the effect of different epigenetic modifications within the core site depends on the strength of flanking upstream site, providing new insight into how the previously identified intellectual disability-causing and cancer-related mutant R567W disrupts upstream recognition and deregulates CTCF’s methylation sensitivity. Lastly, we used ZNF343 as example to show that a simple iterative motif analysis strategy based on a small set of prefixed cores can reveal the dependent relationship between cores and upstream motifs. These results establish that the current underestimation of ZFPs motif lengths is due to our lack of understanding of intrinsic properties of tandem zinc finger recognition, including irregular motif structure, variable spacing, and dependent recognition between sub-motifs. These results also motivate a need for better recognition models beyond additive, position-weight matrix to predict ZFP specificities, occupancies, and the molecular mechanisms of disease mutations.

Dynamic Nature of CTCF Tandem 11 Zinc Fingers in Multivalent Recognition of DNA As Revealed by NMR Spectroscopy

The interaction of DNA with multi-Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins.

Molecular Mechanism of Directional CTCF Recognition of a Diverse Range of Genomic Sites

Quantitative analysis of ZFY and CTCF reveals dependent recognition of tandem zinc finger proteins

Distinct properties and functions of CTCF revealed by a rapidly inducible degron system

Single-molecule imaging reveals a direct role of CTCF's zinc fingers in SA interaction and cluster-dependent RNA recruitment

Many Facades of CTCF Unified by Its Coding for Three-Dimensional Genome Architecture

CTCF DNA-binding Domain Undergoes Dynamic and Selective Protein–protein Interactions

Reading Time and DNA Sequence Preference of TET3 CXXC Domain Revealed by Single-Molecule Profiling

A complex CTCF binding code defines TAD boundary structure and function

Inferring CTCF-binding Patterns and Anchored Loops Across Human Tissues and Cell Types

Multi-feature clustering of CTCF binding creates robustness for loop extrusion blocking and Topologically Associating Domain boundaries

Tandem CTCF sites function as insulators to balance spatial chromatin contacts and topological enhancer-promoter selection

DNA Conformation Induces Adaptable Binding by Tandem Zinc Finger Proteins

A negatively-charged region within carboxy-terminal domain maintains proper CTCF DNA binding

Characterization of the Target DNA Sequence for the DNA-binding Domain of Zinc Finger Protein 191

Characterization of the Interaction Interface and Conformational Dynamics of Human TGIF1 Homeodomain Upon the Binding of Consensus DNA.

The PTM profiling of CTCF reveals the regulation of 3D chromatin structure by O-GlcNAcylation

CTCF-mediated Functional Chromatin Interactome in Pluripotent Cells.

CTCF Interacts with and Recruits the Largest Subunit of RNA Polymerase II to CTCF Target Sites Genome-Wide.

Structural and modelling insights into the dynamic association between the transcription factor and DNA