Discrimination of Pyogenic Spondylitis from Brucellar Spondylitis on MRI

Tao Li,Wei Li,Yong Du,Meng Gao,Xiaoyang Liu,Guodong Wang,Haomin Cui,Zhensong Jiang,Xingang Cui,Jianmin Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000011195
IF: 1.6
2018-01-01
Medicine
Abstract:Abstract Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing between pyogenic spondylitis and brucellar spondylitis. Although pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) and brucellar spondylitis (BS) are common causes of spinal infections, the variety of their clinical manifestations complicates differential diagnosis. MRI may be helpful in differential diagnosis and treatment. MRI images of 64 patients who underwent MRI of the spine and with confirmed spondylitis were retrospectively reviewed. After referring to the related medical literature, we compared 32 patients with pyogenic spondylitis and 32 patients with brucellar spondylitis regarding MRI findings. Statistical analysis was performed with the chi-square test. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. The significant differences between PS and BS on MRI findings are listed as follows (P < .05): diffuse, partial and fan-shaped hyperintense signals on middle sagittal fat-suppressed weighted images (PS: 51, 11, 3/65 vs BS:35, 18, 19/72); focal endplate destruction (PS: 9/43 vs BS:27/35); extensive end plate destruction (PS: 29/43 vs BS:8/35); ballooning change of the intravertebral space (PS: 7/32 vs BS:0/32); an inflammatory reaction line from the end plate (PS: 30/65 vs BS: 1/72); a disc invasion sign (PS: 1/28 vs BS:12/33); an inflammatory reaction line in the disc (PS: 5/28 vs BS:25/33); and 8) severe intravertebral space destruction (PS: 17/28 vs BS:12/33); MRI imaging provides useful information for the differentiation between pyogenic spondylitis and brucellar spondylitis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?