Abstract:BACKGROUND:Compared with open surgery, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has innovated the concept of the minimally invasive approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in past decades. This present study aimed to compare the perioperative and lymph node dissection outcomes between VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy for pathological stage T1 (pT1) NSCLC patients from both surgical and oncologic perspectives.METHODS:This was a retrospective multicenter study. Patients who underwent surgical resection for pT1 NSCLC between January 2014 and September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed from 10 thoracic surgery centers in China. Perioperative and lymph node dissection outcomes of pT1 NSCLC patients who accepted VATS or open lobectomies were compared by propensity score matching (PSM) analysis.RESULTS:Of the 11,360 patients who underwent surgery for pT1 NSCLC, 7,726 were enrolled based on the selection criteria, including 1,222 cases of open lobectomies and 6,504 cases of VATS lobectomies. PSM resulted in 1,184 cases of open lobectomies and 1,184 cases of VATS lobectomies being well matched by common prognostic variables, including age, sex, and surgical side. VATS lobectomy led to better perioperative outcomes, including less blood loss (133.5±200.1 vs. 233.3±318.4, P<0.001), lower blood transfusion rate (2.4% vs. 6.4%, P<0.001), shorter postoperative hospital stay (8.6±5.7 vs. 10.1±5.1, P<0.001), less chest drainage volume (1,109.5±854.0 vs. 1,324.1±948.8, P<0.001), and less postoperative complications (4.9% vs. 8.2%, P<0.001). However, open lobectomy had better lymph node dissection outcomes than VATS, with increased lymph node dissection numbers (16.1±9.4 vs. 13.7±7.7, P<0.001) and more positive lymph nodes being dissected (1.5±3.9 vs. 1.1±2.5, P=0.002). Compared with VATS, open lobectomy harvested more lymph node stations (5.5±1.9 vs. 5.2±1.8, P=0.001), including more pathological N2 (pN2) lymph node stations (3.4±1.4 vs. 3.1±1.3, P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:VATS lobectomy was associated with better perioperative outcomes, such as less blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, shorter postoperative hospital stay, less chest drainage volume and less postoperative complications. Open lobectomy has improved lymph node dissection outcomes, as more lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes were dissected for pT1 NSCLC patients during surgery.

Is It Safe and Practical to Use a Foley Catheter As a Chest Tube for Lung Cancer Patients after Lobectomy? A Prospective Cohort Study with 441 Cases.

The Long-Term Impact of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications after Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Comparison of the Results of Two Chest Tube Managements During an Enhanced Recovery Program after Video‐assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Trial

The Society for Translational Medicine: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Postoperative Management of Chest Tube for Patients Undergoing Lobectomy

Lung Ultrasound and Diaphragmatic Excursion Assessment for Evaluating Perioperative Atelectasis and Aeration Loss During Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: a Feasibility Study

Clinical Analysis of Single Utility Port Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Surgical Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Perioperative Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Open Lobectomy for Pt1-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in China: a Multi-Center Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

A Novel Tubeless Urinary Catheter Protocol Enhanced Recovery after Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery

A Novel Drainage Strategy Using Chest Tube Plus Pleural Catheter in Uniportal Upper Lobectomy: A Randomized Study

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Sleeve Lobectomy with Bronchoplasty

Is tubeless uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary wedge resection a safe procedure?

Safety of one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy

The oxidation of malate by mitochondria isolated from cauliflower buds.

Free of Choice on Anterior and Posterior Chest Tube Position after Lung Cancer Resection.

A novel drainage strategy using chest tube plus pleural catheter in uniportal upper lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial

Tubeless single-port thoracoscopic sublobar resection: indication and safety

Randomized Trial of Modified Chest Tube Placement vs Routine Placement After Lung Resection

Omitting Chest Tube Drainage after Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Video‐assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy after percutaneous coronary intervention in lung cancer patients with concomitant coronary heart disease

Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for clinical stage Ⅰ / Ⅱ non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center comparative study

Intermittent chest tube clamping may shorten chest tube drainage and postoperative hospital stay after lung cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.