Protective effects of exogenous carbon monoxide on the lipopolysaccharide induced intestinal damage of rats
Xu Xin-rong,Ma Ke,Liu Shao-hua,Xu Bing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.48.047
2006-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To observe the CO inhalation and CO intraperitoneal injection, the protective effects of exogenous CO on the damaged intestine induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and to explore the relationship of protective effect with production of free radical and proinflammatory cytokine platelet activating factor. METHODS: The experiment was performed at the Laboratory of Animal Experimental Center, Nanjing Medical University from March to August 2005. Totally 96 healthy male SD rats were selected. LPS rat models with damaged intestinal tract by LPS intravenous injection were divided into 6 groups randomly: control group with 6 rats and 18 rats in each group. Control group (intravenous injection with equivalent saline), LPS group (intravenous injection LPS, 5 mg/kg), CO inhalation group (2.5×10-4 CO inhalation), CO intraperitoneal injection group (2 mL/kg CO intraperitoneal injection), LPS injection (intravenous injection LPS, 5 mg/kg) plus CO inhalation (2.5×10-4) group and LPS injection (intravenous injection LPS, 5 mg/kg) plus CO intraperitoneal injection (2 mL/kg CO intraperitoneal injection) group were observed at hours 1, 3 and 6 time points in each group. Intestinal malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined with thiobarbitric acid method. Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity was determined with chromatometry method. Change of platelet activating factor (PAF) was detected with sandwich enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).RESULTS: A total of 96 rats were involved in the result analysis. ①content of intestinal MDA in experimental rats: After LPS administration, rat intestinal MDA increased at hours 1, 3 and 6 time points as compared with the control group. It decreased at hours 3 and 6 in the LPS injection plus CO inhalation group as compared with the LPS group; It decreased at hours 1 and 3 in the LPS injection plus CO intraperitoneal injection group as compared with the LPS group [(0.614±0.057) nmol/g in the control group, (1.443±0.255),(2.747±0.385),(4.023±0.762) nmol/g in the LPS group at hours 1, 3 and 6 time points,(1.172±0.328),(1.740±0.174),(3.417±0.556) nmol/g in the LPS injection plus CO inhalation group, (0.918±0.177),(1.857±0.320),(3.581±0.606) nmol/g in the LPS injection plus CO intraperitoneal injection group,P < 0.05 or 0.01]. ②MPO activity: MPO activity decreased in the LPS injection plus CO inhalation group as compared with the LPS group at hours 3 and 6; It reduced obviously in the LPS injection plus CO intraperitoneal injection group as compared with the LPS group at hours 1, 3 and 6 [At hours 1, 3 and 6(39.875±4.551),(68.080±18.670),(80.333±16.187) nkat/g in the LPS group,(31.823±5.018),(52.077±14.653),(67.730±8.918) nkat/g in the LPS injectionplus CO inhalation group,(29.839±4.801),(51.577 ±12.386),(69.814±10.669) nkat/g in the LPS injection plus CO intraperitoneal injection group,P < 0.05 or 0.01]. ③PAF content: At hours 1, 3 and 6 it increased in the LPS group as compared with the control group; It decreased in the LPS injection plus CO inhalation group as compared with the LPS group at hour 3 and 6; It reduced in the LPS injection plus CO intraperitoneal injection group as compared with the LPS group at hours 1, 3 and 6 [(0.432±0.079) ng/g in the control group, at hours 1, 3 and 6(0.612±0.013),(1.103±0.208),(1.466±0.135) ng/g in the LPS group,(0.565±0.031),(0.878±0.181),(1.308±0.087) ng/g in the LPS injection plus CO inhalation group,(0.499±0.021),(0.772±0.074),(1.433±0.073) ng/g in the LPS injection plus CO intraperitoneal injection group,P < 0.05 or 0.01]. ④arterial blood COHb change: 2.5×10-4 CO inhalation and 2 mL/kg CO intraperitoneal injection could increase COHb, but did not exceed the 10% safe range. ⑤comparison of the two methods: CO intraperitoneal injection produced a marked effect on rat intestine earlier than that CO inhalation did, but the effect of CO inhalation lasted longer. CONCLUSION: Low concentration CO inhalation and low dose CO intraperitoneal injection have a protective effect on rat intestine attacked by LPS. CO protects the rat intestine against LPS by the way of inhibiting expression of PAF and increasing MPO activity, and CO increases rat intestine antioxidation ability. CO intraperitoneal injection and CO inhalation have the same protective effect on rat intestine, but CO intraperitoneal has an earlier effect while CO inhalation has a longer effect.