Effect of Norepinephrine on Host Immunity and Bacterial Infection
Jia Wang,Zhiyao Fang,Xue Dong,Wenwen Li,Xianyao Wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000002931
IF: 6.133
2023-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:To the Editor: Norepinephrine (NE), which belongs to the catecholamine family, is increasingly produced by the sympathetic nervous system and adrenal medulla when the host is under stress. It has been demonstrated that NE has a significant anti-inflammatory effect. In addition, increasing evidence has indicated that stress hormones are directly involved in the interaction between bacteria and the host. A variety of bacteria can exhibit changes in growth, virulence, and biofilm by high concentrations of NE. Therefore, this article aimed to summarize the main research developments regarding the effects of NE on host immunity and bacterial infection, as well as the attendant molecular mechanisms [Figure 1].Figure 1: Effect of norepinephrine on host immunity and bacterial infection. ARs: Adrenergic receptors; IL-10: Interleukin-10; TNF-α: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha.In fact, while NE can affect the immune response by activating alpha (α)-adrenergic receptors (ARs), it mainly induces an anti-inflammatory effect by activating the more expressed beta (β)-ARs in immune cells, which is reflected in innate and adaptive immunity. In a recent study, Stolk et al[1] comprehensively explored the effects of NE on the immune response both in vitro and in vivo. Here, it was found that NE inhibited the production of proinflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and promoted the production of the anti-inflammatory factor, interleukin-10 (IL-10), in whole blood in vitro as well as in animal models in vivo. In the volunteer participants who received intravenous lipopolysaccharide injection, the NE increased the production of IL-10 and attenuated the release of interferon-inducible protein 10. Meanwhile, the ratio of TNF-α/IL-10 in patients treated for septic shock was found to be negatively correlated with the infusion rates of NE. In addition, it was observed that the NE inhibited the chemotactic movement, activation, and phagocytosis of neutrophils. The effect of NE on acquired immunity has also been established. An early clinical study found that long-term administration of NE decreased the number of T lymphocytes, while short-term administration of NE increased the number of CD8+ T lymphocytes. Elsewhere, Deviet al[2] used intravital two-photon imaging to ascertain that the NE injection inhibited the movement of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in mice, and confirmed that the inhibition of T lymphocyte movement induced by NE was related to the impaired immune response. Numerous studies have suggested that NE can directly affect bacterial growth. Iron (Fe) is an essential element for bacterial growth. In the host, Fe3+ is mainly bound to proteins with a high affinity for Fe under normal conditions, such as transferrin (Tf) in the serum and lactoferrin (Lf) in mucosal secretions, and cannot be taken up by bacteria. Meanwhile, chemical Fe-binding analyses and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy experiments have demonstrated that NE could form a complex with Tf, Lf, and Fe. The complex formation induces the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ and the dissociation of Fe from Tf and Lf. Both dissociated Fe3+ and Fe2+ can be used as a direct source of nutrients for bacteria. In addition, bacteria can secrete siderophores to compete Fe3+ with Fe-binding proteins for their growth. Furthermore, NE can stimulate bacterial growth by promoting the production of siderophores. Siderophore receptor proteins exist in the outer membrane of various bacteria, which can recognize Fe3+-siderophore complexes and then transfer the Fe3+ into bacteria, while NE can promote the transport of Fe into the bacteria related to outer membrane receptors. In addition to utilizing Fe, NE can induce the production of autoinducers to promote the growth of bacteria. However, the attendant mechanism remains unclear and requires further studies. In addition to bacterial growth, NE can also affect bacterial virulence and biofilms, with the NE enhancing the virulence of Yersinia ruckeri, resulting in a significantly increased case fatality rate in animal models of infection.[3] Bacterial biofilms, which are microcolony aggregates formed by single or multiple bacteria to adapt to the external environment, are mainly composed of bacteria and polysaccharide–protein complexes wrapped around bacteria. They are associated with the colonization of bacteria in the body and antibiotic resistance. Many studies have demonstrated that NE can induce the biofilm formation of various bacteria. Due to the effects of NE on bacterial growth and biofilm formation, the bacteriostatic or bactericidal effect of antibiotics which affected by NE has also attracted a great deal of attention. In fact, NE can restore the growth of certain bacteria inhibited by antibiotics. Interestingly, NE promotes the growth of Escherichia coli, but the combined use of NE and levofloxacin increases the efficiency in killing this type of bacteria.[4] As such, the application of NE may aggravate the infection caused by some but not all bacteria. The effect of NE on different bacteria thus requires further studies. In addition to the effect on bacteria, NE also affects gut microbiota. These microorganisms participate in human metabolism and maintain the normal physiological state of the host through mutual signal exchanges. Under stress, the enteric nervous system sympathetic nerve endings synthesize and secrete NE, which may directly affect the gut microbiota, thereby affecting the physiological state of the host. To evaluate the effect of trauma and hemorrhage on the composition of the gut microbiota, a recent study analyzed the cecal microbiome composition and diversity in a mouse model of multiple trauma and hemorrhage using 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequencing. The results revealed no statistically significant differences in the microbial diversity or microbial community composition between the different model groups. However, the application of NE resulted in an increased microbial diversity in the cecum of shocked mice, with the degree of increase in microbial abundance dependent on the amount of NE required to maintain the blood pressure. Nonetheless, NE remains clinically recommended as a first-line vasoactive drug to treat patients with septic shock. Since there is no time to take the possible adverse effects into consideration when rescuing lives, it is important to determine precisely when we should focus on the adverse effects. As the excessive dosing or duration of NE infusion increases, the problem of adverse effects becomes more and more apparent. In a multicenter retrospective observational study pertaining to septic shock, the patients who developed tachycardia had a three-fold increased risk of death after using high-dose NE for 24 h (≥0.3 μg·kg–1·min–1) compared with those who did not develop tachycardia.[5] In addition, most septic shock patients using high-dose NE present extremely unstable hemodynamics. On the one hand, patients might have a serious shortage of fluid intake, while on the other hand, the infection might not be well controlled or might combine with other infections. Moreover, certain factors might inhibit the myocardial function in the body, which would likely to lead to poor prognosis. However, due to relatively little research on the adverse clinical effects of NE, the exact time of these adverse effects has not been determined. In the future, it is crucial to further study the mechanism of NE in vivo and to pay attention to the attendant adverse effects in clinical application, which will enrich and optimize the understanding of NE and provide both a basis and new ideas for better clinical application. Funding This work was supported by a grant from the Dalian Peak Planning Project of Liaoning Province, China (No. 2022DF046). Conflicts of interest None.