Abstract:PURPOSE:To investigate the value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) in the detection of periampullary cancer.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Ninety-nine patients with surgery or biopsy-proven periampullary cancer who underwent both DCEUS and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations before operation were enrolled in our study. DCEUS in which intravenous microbubbles were used in combination with oral contrast agent and MRI were performed preoperatively to make a detection diagnosis of periampullary cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of DCEUS, B-mode ultrasonography (BUS) and MRI were calculated and compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the accuracy of BUS, DCEUS and MRI in the detection. Stratified analyses were performed for different pathological types and different sizes of periampullary lesions. The inter- and intra-observer reliability of DCEUS for cancer detection was also investigated.RESULT:There were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV or accuracy between DCEUS and MRI (all P>0.05). ROC analysis showed that the accuracy of DCEUS or MRI was higher than that of BUS (P<0.001), while no significant differences were noted in the accuracy between DCEUS and MR. In the 76 cases of periampullary cancer, DCEUS appeared to be superior to BUS for ampullary carcinoma, duodenum carcinoma and for lesions with an average diameter of less than 3cm. DCEUS appeared equal to BUS in other groups. No significant differences were noted between DCEUS and MRI in the stratified analysis. A considerably well agreement between DCEUS and MRI was obtained using Kappa analysis (k=0.649, P<0.001). The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility were both good for detection of periampullary cancer by DCEUS, with a Kappa values of 0.783 (P<0.01) and 0.732 (P<0.01), respectively.CONCLUSION:DCEUS provides an available and useful imaging modality in the detection of periampullary cancer. This technique can aid in displaying the invisible periampullary region in BUS and may also become an effective supplemental method to MRI.

[The Diagnostic Value of Double Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound in Colorectal Neoplasms].

[Application Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Assessing the High-Risk Population of Hepatic Malignant Tumor].

The value of double contrast-enhanced unltrasonography in macroscopic classification of rectal carcinoma

Preliminary application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to assess the peripancreatic vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma

Clinical Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Stromal Tumors

Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Preoperative TN Staging for Gastric Cancer

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Metastatic Adrenal Carcinoma

[Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative T-staging of Gastric Cancer].

Comparison of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and MDCT for Assessing Vascular Involvement of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Preliminary Results Correlated with Surgical Findings

Application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to access the lymph nodes metastasis of gastric carcinoma

The value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in Borrmann classification of advanced gastric carcinoma

Preoperative T Staging of Advanced Gastric Cancer Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound.

Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Preoperative Borrmann Classification of Advanced Gastric Carcinoma: Comparison with Histopathology

Evaluation of the Chemotherapy Effect in Advanced Gastric Carcinoma Using Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

Added Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Conventional Ultrasound for Characterization of Indeterminate Soft-Tissue Tumors.

The Value of Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and DCE-magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Evaluation of Pectal Cancer

Comparison of the Diagnostic Value between Intraluminal Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography and Conventional Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Colorectal Neoplasms

Double Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in the Detection of Periampullary Cancer: Comparison with B-mode Ultrasonography and MR Imaging.

Contrast- Enhanced Ultrasonography Promotes Differential Diagnosis of Ureteral Neoplasms

The diagnostic value of contrast -enhanced ultrasound in breast benign tumors with elastography >3 points

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Renal Pelvic Carcinoma