Value of Texture Analysis Based on Enhanced MRI for Predicting an Early Therapeutic Response to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolisation Combined with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

J. Y. Yu,H. P. Zhang,Z. Y. Tang,J. Zhou,X. J. He,Y. Y. Liu,X. J. Liu,D. J. Guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2018.04.013
IF: 3.389
2018-01-01
Clinical Radiology
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the potential value of texture analysis (TA) based on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for predicting an early response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who were treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with HCC (n=89) who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI at 1.5 T 1 week before and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after TACE/HIFU were included in this retrospective study. Early responses were evaluated by two radiologists according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Cancer of the Liver (RECICL). An independent Student's t-test and the Manne-Whitney U-test were used to compare the TA parameters between the complete response (CR) group and the non-complete response (NCR) group. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of the NCR lesions. RESULTS: Among the 89 patients, 58 showed CR and 31 showed NCR. Before TACE/HIFU, the CR group showed higher uniformity and energy but lower entropy than the NCR group (p<0.05). After TACE/HIFU, the CR group showed higher uniformity and energy but lower entropy and skewness than the NCR group (p<0.05). The logistic regression and ROC curve analyses showed that the entropy before TACE/HIFU and the skewness and entropy 1 week after TACE/HIFU were predictors of an early response. CONCLUSION: TA parameters based on contrast-enhanced MRI images 1 week before and after TACE/HIFU may act as imaging biomarkers to predict an early response of patients with HCC. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?