Sa1619 Chromoendoscopy With Indigo Carmine Dye Added to Acetic Acid in the Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer and Precancerous Lesion
Li Xueliang,Jie Sha,Lin Lin,Ruihua Shi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.354
IF: 10.396
2011-01-01
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Abstract:Background and AimGastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the world and is the most common malignancy in China, South America, and Eastern Europe. Early diagnosis is necessary for cure of this terrible disease and endoscopic examination has proved to be the most accurate diagnostic method. However, recent endoscopic imaging techniques for recognition of unclear lesions in the stomach (e.g. magnifying endoscopy, narrow band imaging) require special equipment and therefore are not commonly used especially in developing countries. The purpose of the present study is to estimate the accuracy of a new chromoendoscopic method using indigo carmine added to acetic acid (AI) in diagnosing early gastric cancers (EGC) and precancerous lesion (PCL).MethodsThe present study was conducted in 220 patients who were found doubtful lesions in the conventional electronic endoscopic diagnosis. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, 110 cases of each group, endoscopic dye group was evenly sprinkled with acetic acid and indigo carmine, then biopsy. The control group was not stained, determined by the naked eye and conventional biopsy. EGC and PCL detection rate was compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the staining group, 20 cases had mucosa discoloration, the EGC and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) detection rate was 95%(19/20); 61 cases appeared poorly stained, the intestinal metaplasia (IM) and low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) detection rate was 90.16%(55/61). In the endoscopic dye group, 13 EGC, 18 intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) and 48 IM were found, while in the control group 3 cases, 6 cases and 27 cases respectively. There were significant differences of the EGC, IN and IM between the two groups (P = 0.009, P = 0.009, P = 0.003).ConclusionThe AI method is helpful for the diagnosis of EGC and PCL accurately. It is easy, safe and inexpensive. Background and AimGastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the world and is the most common malignancy in China, South America, and Eastern Europe. Early diagnosis is necessary for cure of this terrible disease and endoscopic examination has proved to be the most accurate diagnostic method. However, recent endoscopic imaging techniques for recognition of unclear lesions in the stomach (e.g. magnifying endoscopy, narrow band imaging) require special equipment and therefore are not commonly used especially in developing countries. The purpose of the present study is to estimate the accuracy of a new chromoendoscopic method using indigo carmine added to acetic acid (AI) in diagnosing early gastric cancers (EGC) and precancerous lesion (PCL). Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the world and is the most common malignancy in China, South America, and Eastern Europe. Early diagnosis is necessary for cure of this terrible disease and endoscopic examination has proved to be the most accurate diagnostic method. However, recent endoscopic imaging techniques for recognition of unclear lesions in the stomach (e.g. magnifying endoscopy, narrow band imaging) require special equipment and therefore are not commonly used especially in developing countries. The purpose of the present study is to estimate the accuracy of a new chromoendoscopic method using indigo carmine added to acetic acid (AI) in diagnosing early gastric cancers (EGC) and precancerous lesion (PCL). MethodsThe present study was conducted in 220 patients who were found doubtful lesions in the conventional electronic endoscopic diagnosis. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, 110 cases of each group, endoscopic dye group was evenly sprinkled with acetic acid and indigo carmine, then biopsy. The control group was not stained, determined by the naked eye and conventional biopsy. EGC and PCL detection rate was compared between the two groups. The present study was conducted in 220 patients who were found doubtful lesions in the conventional electronic endoscopic diagnosis. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups, 110 cases of each group, endoscopic dye group was evenly sprinkled with acetic acid and indigo carmine, then biopsy. The control group was not stained, determined by the naked eye and conventional biopsy. EGC and PCL detection rate was compared between the two groups. ResultsIn the staining group, 20 cases had mucosa discoloration, the EGC and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) detection rate was 95%(19/20); 61 cases appeared poorly stained, the intestinal metaplasia (IM) and low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) detection rate was 90.16%(55/61). In the endoscopic dye group, 13 EGC, 18 intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) and 48 IM were found, while in the control group 3 cases, 6 cases and 27 cases respectively. There were significant differences of the EGC, IN and IM between the two groups (P = 0.009, P = 0.009, P = 0.003). In the staining group, 20 cases had mucosa discoloration, the EGC and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) detection rate was 95%(19/20); 61 cases appeared poorly stained, the intestinal metaplasia (IM) and low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) detection rate was 90.16%(55/61). In the endoscopic dye group, 13 EGC, 18 intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) and 48 IM were found, while in the control group 3 cases, 6 cases and 27 cases respectively. There were significant differences of the EGC, IN and IM between the two groups (P = 0.009, P = 0.009, P = 0.003). ConclusionThe AI method is helpful for the diagnosis of EGC and PCL accurately. It is easy, safe and inexpensive. The AI method is helpful for the diagnosis of EGC and PCL accurately. It is easy, safe and inexpensive.