Mefatinib As First-Line Treatment of EGFR Sensitizing Mutation-Positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Phase III Efficacy and Biomarker Study.
Jia Yu,Caicun Zhou,Wang Kai,Qiming Wang,Hongrui Niu,Cheng-Zhi Zhou,Panwen Tian,Wu Zhuang,Jie Li,Jing Wang,Xu Sun,Bing Yu,Chaonan Zhu,Jianghua Chen,June Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.8546
IF: 45.3
2024-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:8546 Background: Mefatinib is an irreversible and highly effective EGFR and HER2 dual inhibitor. Although EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors are standard 1st line therapy for EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), co-mutations, such as TP53 are associated with shorter PFS of EGFR TKI. Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19 del) or exon 21 L858R mutant (L858R), stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were enrolled and randomized at 2:1 ratio to receive mefatinib 60 mg PO QD or gefitinib 250 mg PO QD; The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee (IRC). Archival tumor samples were analyzed using a 150 genes next-generation sequencing panel for biomarker analysis. Results: 336 eligible patients were assigned to receive mefatinib (n = 223) or gefitinib (n = 113). The median PFS of mefatinib was longer than gefitinib (13.73 vs. 9.66 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.68, P= 0.0024) and even longer in L858R subgroup (13.73 vs. 8.28 months, HR = 0.55). The data on overall survival (OS) were immature at the cut-off date ( < 40% events). 288 patients (189 in mefatinib and 99 in gefitinib) had available tumor samples for exploratory biomarker analysis. TP53 mutations were the most common disruptive concurrent alterations (45%). In patients with co-occurring disruptive mutations, mefatinib showed significant improvement in PFS compared to gefininib (12.55 vs 9.56 months, HR = 0.56, P= 0.0005; 12.55 vs 12.39 months, HR = 0.65, P= 0.0753 in 19del; and 13.70 vs 8.28 months, HR = 0.44, P= 0.0004 in L858R); Similarly, OS benefit of mefatinib was observed compared to gefitinib (not reached vs 26.68 months, HR = 0.54, P= 0.0045; not reached vs not reached, HR = 0.75, P= 0.4121 in 19del; and not reached vs 20.01 months, HR = 0.40, P= 0.0006 in L858R). Mefatinib had a favorable safety profile, with only 5.8% of patients experiencing dose reduction and less than 5% discontinuing treatment. Conclusions: Mefatinib is a new frontline option for EGFRmutant NSCLC. Co-occurring disruptive mutations caused decreased therapeutic efficacy of gefitinib, but had minimal impact on the PFS and OS of mefatinib. Comparing to gefitinib, PFS and OS improvements of mefatinib were most pronounced in patients with EGFR L858R mutation, especially those with disruptive co-occurring mutations. EGFR 19del or L858R mutation alone may not be sufficient to inform optimized front line therapies. Further studies are warranted to verify functional concurrent mutations for a better individualized precision medicine. Clinical trial information: CTR20192297.