Abstract:Modern computerized planning tools for periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) use either morphology-based or biomechanics-based methods. The latter relies on estimation of peak contact pressures and contact areas using either patient specific or constant thickness cartilage models. We performed a finite element analysis investigating the optimal reorientation of the acetabulum in PAO surgery based on simulated joint contact pressures and contact areas using patient specific cartilage model. Furthermore we investigated the influences of using patient specific cartilage model or constant thickness cartilage model on the biomechanical simulation results. Ten specimens with hip dysplasia were used in this study. Image data were available from CT arthrography studies. Bone models were reconstructed. Mesh models for the patient specific cartilage were defined and subsequently loaded under previously reported boundary and loading conditions. Peak contact pressures and contact areas were estimated in the original position. Afterwards we used a validated preoperative planning software to change the acetabular inclination by an increment of 5° and measured the lateral center edge angle (LCE) at each reorientation position. The position with the largest contact area and the lowest peak contact pressure was defined as the optimal position. In order to investigate the influence of using patient specific cartilage model or constant thickness cartilage model on the biomechanical simulation results, the same procedure was repeated with the same bone models but with a cartilage mesh of constant thickness. Comparison of the peak contact pressures and the contact areas between these two different cartilage models showed that good correlation between these two cartilage models for peak contact pressures (r = 0.634 ∈ [0.6, 0.8], p < 0.001) and contact areas (r = 0.872 > 0.8, p < 0.001). For both cartilage models, the largest contact areas and the lowest peak pressures were found at the same position. Our study is the first study comparing peak contact pressures and contact areas between patient specific and constant thickness cartilage models during PAO planning. Good correlation for these two models was detected. Computer assisted planning with FE modeling using constant thickness cartilage models might be a promising PAO planning tool when a conventional CT is available.

[Study on Finite Element Analysis Method for the Pre-operative Planning of Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy].

Computer-Assisted Optimization of the Acetabular Rotation in Periacetabular Osteotomy Using Patient's Anatomy-Specific Finite Element Analysis

Theoretical Implications of Periacetabular Osteotomy in Various Dysplastic Acetabular Cartilage Defects As Determined by Finite Element Analysis

Biomechanical Optimization-Based Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Preoperative Planning Of Periacetabular Osteotomy (Pao)

Development of a Novel Customized Cutting and Rotating Template for Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Does the optimal position of the acetabular fragment should be within the radiological normal range for all developmental dysplasia of the hip? A patient-specific finite element analysis

A Modular Software System For 3d Measurement Of Acetabulum In Arthritic Dysplasia Hips

Finite Element Analysis of Acetabular Impacting Total Hip Replacement for Acetabular Dysplasia in Adults

Computer Assisted Planning, Simulation and Navigation of Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Study on Simulation Modeling Method of the Reconstruction Following Resection of Peri-Acetabular Tumors

Finite Element Analysis of Various Osteotomies Used in the Treatment of Developmental Hip Dysplasia in Children

Analysis of Preoperative Factors Affecting the Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy

Finite Element Analysis of Acetabulum Prosthesis' Lining Damage Zone with Different Implanting Angle

Optimization Technique and Fe Simulation for Lag Screw Placement in Anterior Column of the Acetabulum

Three-dimensional Morphology of Lunate Surface in Hip Dysplasia: Theoretical Implications for Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Is cup positioning easier in DDH patients previously treated with Bernese periacetabular osteotomy?

Evaluation of Constant Thickness Cartilage Models Vs. Patient Specific Cartilage Models for an Optimized Computer-Assisted Planning of Periacetabular Osteotomy

Pre-periacetabular Osteotomy Three-dimensional CT Evaluation in Patients with Acetabular Dysplasia

Use of 3D Printed Models to Determine Accurate Bone Cuts during a Periacetabular Osteotomy for Developmental Hip Dysplasia

[Three-dimensional finite element analysis of acetabular prosthesis in an adult patient with total flip arthroplasty for high dislocation].