Abstract:As a typical form of empathy, empathy for pain refers to the perception, judgment of others’ pain, as well as corresponding affective responses. Deficit in empathy for pain may lead to withdrawal, indifference to other’s pain or aggressive behavior.Some contextual factors, especially the observers’ traits, may have an influence on empathy for pain. Previous studies have focused on empathy for pain of special groups like physicians and offenders, but most of these studies are questionnaire surveys and there is little research on the cognitive neural mechanisms.Moreover, observing stimuli in different perspectives also affects empathy for pain, and whether this effect exists in special groups remains unknown. Investigating the capacity of empathy in violent offenders can deepen our understanding about the mechanisms of empathy and provide some supports for their training program. Using a picture-priming paradigm, the present studypresented painful and non-painful stimuli toviolent offenders and ordinary (control) participants and simultaneously recorded their ERP data. The experiment consisted of two blocks and the participants were asked to view stimuli in first-person and other-person perspectives, respectively. Painful or non-painful pictures were presented for 1000ms, which werefollowed by a fixationlasting randomly for 1500-1700ms. In order to make sure that the participants viewed the pictures carefully, only 10% pictures were randomly chosen and needed participants’ responses. These pictures were accompanied by a response screen showing that “Painful picture: F; Non-painful picture: J”. The screen disappeared after a button pressing.For the remained trials, the participants just needed to view pictures carefully. The results showedthat the latencies and amplitudes of N110, P2 and P300 were different between violent offenders and control group. When viewing painful pictures, violent offenders had longer latency of N110 and P2 than what, and the amplitude of P2 was larger than what. When they viewed pictures under other-person perspective they also had longer latency of N110 than what?. Furthermore, for the amplitude of P300, control grouphad smaller amplitude when viewing painful pictures in both perspectives, while for violent offenders this effect only existed under other-person perspective. Our results indicated that violent offenders might have lower capacity of empathy for pain than control group. The present study supports the Communications Model of empathy for pain and expands previous studies to some extent. This may also provide some empirical support for the training program of offenders. However, we also have some limitations that need further investigations in the future.

Working Memory Load Modulates the Neural Response to Other's Pain: Evidence from an ERP Study.

Empathy for pain influenced by cognitive load:Evidence from an ERP study

Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Are Reflected in Different ERP and EEG Patterns to Task Difficulty

Working Memory Asymmetrically Modulates Auditory and Linguistic Processing of Speech.

The Effect of Cognitive Load on Interaction Pattern of Emotion and Working Memory: an ERP Study

The mutual influences between working memory and empathy for pain: the role of social distance

The Cognitive Load Affects the Interaction Pattern of Emotion and Working Memory

The Electrophysiological Effect of Working Memory Load on Involuntary Attention in an Auditory–visual Distraction Paradigm: an ERP Study

Social contexts modulate neural responses in the processing of others’ pain: An event-related potential study

Working memory load affects early affective responses to concrete and abstract words differently: Evidence from ERPs

Effects of Memory Load of Brain Activation in Object Working Memory Task

Investigation of the interaction between emotion and working memory load using spatiotemporal pattern similarity analysis

Dose Violent Offenders Have Lower Capacity of Empathy for Pain: Evidence from ERPs

The effect of reward expectation on working memory of emotional faces under different levels of cognitive load: an ERP study

Emotional Primes Modulate the Responses to Others’ Pain: an ERP Study

Working Memory Load-Dependent Spatio-Temporal Activity of Single-Trial P3 Response Detected with an Adaptive Wavelet Denoiser.

Modeling neural and self-reported factors of affective distress in the relationship between pain and working memory in healthy individuals

Dispositional Self-Construal Modulates the Empathy for Others’ Pain: An ERP Study

Memory Load Effects On The Executive Control: An Event-Related Potential Study

Attention Bias to Pain Words Comes Early and Cognitive Load Matters: Evidence from an ERP Study on Experimental Pain

Instructions of cooperation and competition influence the neural responses to others’ pain: An ERP study