Getting the Invite List Right: a Discussion of Sepsis Severity Scoring Systems in Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis and Randomized Trial Inclusion Criteria

Matti Tolonen,Federico Coccolini,Luca Ansaloni,Massimo Sartelli,Derek J. Roberts,Jessica L. McKee,Ari Leppaniemi,Christopher J. Doig,Fausto Catena,Timothy Fabian,Craig N. Jenne,Osvaldo Chiara,Paul Kubes,Yoram Kluger,Gustavo P. Fraga,Bruno M. Pereira,Jose J. Diaz,Michael Sugrue,Ernest E. Moore,Jianan Ren,Chad G. Ball,Raul Coimbra,Elijah Dixon,Walter Biffl,Anthony MacLean,Paul B. McBeth,Juan G. Posadas-Calleja,Salomone Di Saverio,Jimmy Xiao,Andrew W. Kirkpatrick
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0177-2
2018-01-01
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Abstract:Severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis (SCIAS) is a worldwide challenge with increasing incidence. Open abdomen management with enhanced clearance of fluid and biomediators from the peritoneum is a potential therapy requiring prospective evaluation. Given the complexity of powering multi-center trials, it is essential to recruit an inception cohort sick enough to benefit from the intervention; otherwise, no effect of a potentially beneficial therapy may be apparent. An evaluation of abilities of recognized predictive systems to recognize SCIAS patients was conducted using an existing intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) database.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?