[Emergency Cholecystectomy Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Followed by Delayed Cholecystectomy in Patients with Moderate Acute Cholecystitis].

C W Ke,S D Wu,Y N Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.10.011
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analysis the curative effect of emergency cholecystectomy (EC) and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) followed by delayed cholecystectomy (DC) on the patients with moderate acute cholecystitis.Methods The perioperative dataof patients in EC group (n =47) and in PTGBD-DC group (n =49) were compared retrospectively.Results Compared to PTGBD + DC group,EC patients had a significantly more postoperative abdominal drainage time [(9.0-± 12.9) vs (3.4 ± 2.1) days,P =0.041],more postoperative hospital stay after cholecystectomy [(8.2 ± 3.2) vs (5.1 ± 1.8) days,P =0.004],more intraoperative bleeding [(101 ± 125) vs (33 ± 37) ml,P =0.003],more patients of LC conversion to open cholecystectomy (OC) (19.1% vs 4.1%,P=0.021) and more patients of OC(14.9% vs 0,P =0.005).Also,there were higher incidence of respiratory failure(14.8% vs 2.0%,P =0.029),and admission for ICU (21.3% vs 2.0 %,P =0.003).Also,patients of total OC in non-biliary surgeons group were more than that of biliary surgeons group statistically(63.2% vs 14.3 %,P =0.001).Conclusion PTGBD followed by DC in the treatment of moderate acute cholecystitis was better than EC,especially in patients with complicated comorbidities and in non-biliary surgeons.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?