Tumor-to-background Ratios of the Maximum Standardized Uptake Value Could Not Indicate the Prognosis of Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Shuai Liu,Xingzhu Ju,Zheng Feng,Hao Wen,Junyan Xu,Xiaojun Chen,Xiaohua Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mnm.0000000000000798
2018-01-01
Nuclear Medicine Communications
Abstract:ObjectiveOur study aimed to explore the prognostic influence of tumor-to-background ratios (TBRs) of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) patients.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively investigated 51 advanced HGSC patients who underwent PET/CT before primary surgery at our hospital between January 2010 and June 2015. None of these patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. SUVmax of ovarian tumor (SUVmax-P) and background (SUVmax-B) were measured using a PET/CT workstation. TBR was calculated by SUVmax-P/SUVmax-B. Backgrounds included the liver, mediastinum, and muscle, and TBRs were noted as TBR-L, TBR-Me, and TBR-Mu, respectively. The (2)-test was used to analyze the relationships between PET/CT parameters and several clinical features. Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests in univariate analyses.ResultsThe median (range) follow-up duration was 27 (8-61) months. The median (range) PET/CT parameter values were as follows: SUVmax, 11.41 (3.24-24.14), TBR-L, 2.84 (2.08-11.93), TBL-Me, 2.09 (1.33-9.07), and TBR-Mu, 1.04 (0.56-14.02). The patients were categorized into low and high groups by the median values of these parameters above separately. A larger proportion of patients in the high TBR-Me group were chemoresistant compared with the low-value group (P=0.039). Neither the residual disease nor the ascites levels correlated with SUVmax or TBR values. There were no differences in progression-free survival and overall survival between the patients in the high and low TBR level groups.ConclusionTBRs of SUVmax were not prognostic indicators for advanced HGSC patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?