Abstract:Context: Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is a prevalent degenerative condition affecting the lumbar spine. Local spinal parameters play a pivotal role in surgical complications and in the QoL that adults with spinal deformities experience. Treatment can effectively alleviate radicular symptoms, but it doesn't significantly mitigate postoperative axial symptoms (AS). Objective: The study intended to investigate the correlation between postoperative axial symptoms (AS) and spinal-pelvic parameters for patients with DS of the lumbar spine. Design: The research team conducted a prospective cohort study. Setting: The study took place at the Huai'an Hospital of Huai'an City in the Huai'an District of Huai'an City in JiangSu Province, China. Participants: Participants were 120 patients with DS who had been admitted to the department of orthopedics at the hospital between January 2016 and December 2022 and 120 healthy volunteers during the same period. Intervention: The research team created two groups, each with 120 participants: (1) the intervention group with DS who received posterior laminar decompression + pedicle-screw internal fixation + intervertebral-space bone grafting and fusion, and (2) the control group, the healthy volunteers. Outcome measures: The research team: (1) measured both group's spinal-pelvic parameters at baseline and at 6 months postintervention, (2) evaluated both group's motor functions at baseline and at 6 months postintervention, using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (OAS) scale and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), (3) examined the intervention group's postoperative AS, and (4) analyzed the correlation between the intervention group's spinal-pelvic parameters and its postoperative AS and motor function. Results: At 6 months postintervention, the intervention group's spinal-pelvic parameters-lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) were significantly lower-and-pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), thoracic kyphosis (TK), segmental lumbar lordosis (SLL), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were significantly higher than those of the control group (all P = .000). The intervention group's JOA and ODI scores were significantly lower than those of the control group postintervention (both P = .000). Postintervention compared to the non-AS group, the AS group's LL (P = .000), PI (P = .000), and SS (P = .020) were significantly lower and PT (P = .002), TK (P = .000), SLL (P = .002), and SVA (P = .000) were significantly higher. Postoperative AS was negatively correlated with LL, PI, SS, and positively correlated with PT, TK, SLL, and SVA (all P = .000). The JOA and ODI scores were positively correlated with LL, PI, and SS, and negatively correlated with PT, TK, SLL, and SVA (all P = .000). Conclusions: Postoperative AS in patients with DS is significantly correlated with spinal-pelvic parameters, providing convincing evidence for the evaluation of postoperative dysfunction. However, generalizing to other patients is limited due to the small sample size, which might have resulted in bias in spinal-pelvic parameters. Hence, ongoing trials with large samples are warranted.

Higher Improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Can Be Achieved after Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Clinical and Radiographic Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Classification Type D Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

Is stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion superior to instrumented lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-level, low-grade, lumbar spondylolisthesis?

Radiographic and Clinical Outcome of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Extreme Lumbar Spinal Stenosis of Schizas Grade D: a Retrospective Study

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treating degenerative spondylolisthesis at L 4 with kyphotic versus non-kyphotic angulation

Comparison of sagittal spinopelvic parameters in different types of double-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a retrospective study

Comparative study of three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

The Research on Spinopelvic Parameters and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Complex Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Evaluating the efficacy and suggesting technical optimizations for endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion across different lumbar spondylolisthesis types

Posterolateral lumbar fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Slower and Non-Improvement Following Surgical Treatment of L4-5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

Transforminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis：a Mid-Term Follow-Up Study

Clinical and Radiographic Comparison of Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with L4/5 grade-1 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

How Does the Slump Sitting Radiograph Increase Proportion of Segmental Instability and Kyphotic Alignment of Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis?

279 Does Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Impact Self-care and Functional Independence? Five-Year Analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database

Axial Symptoms and Spinal-pelvic Parameters After Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Clinical and Radiological Predictors of Slower and Non-Improvement Following Surgical Treatment of L4-5 Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Preliminary Results

Radiologic and Clinical Evaluation of Posterolateral Versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Different Types of Double-Level Degenerative Lumber Spondylolisthesis: What Is Different in the Sagittal Plane?

Kinematic characteristics of lumbar spinous processes during axial rotation in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease lateral lumbar interbody fusion and intervention

[COMPARISON OF EFFECTIVENESS AND CHANGE OF SAGITTAL SPINO-PELVIC PARAMETERS BETWEEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL AND CONVENTIONAL OPEN POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSIONS IN TREATMENT OF LOW-DEGREE ISTHMIC LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS]