Type 2 Diabetes and Adiposity Induce Different Lipid Profile Disorders: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Ningjian Wang,Jing Cheng,Zhiyuan Ning,Yi Chen,Bing Han,Qin Li,Chi Chen,Li Zhao,Fangzhen Xia,Dongping Lin,Lixin Guo,Yingli Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02789

2018-01-01

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract:ContextType 2 diabetes and obesity often coexist, so it is difficult to judge whether diabetes or obesity induce certain types of hyperlipidemia due to mutual confounds and reverse causation. We used Mendelian randomization analyses to explore the causal relationships of diabetes and adiposity with lipid profiles.Design, Setting, and Main Outcome MeasuresFrom 23 sites in East China, 9798 participants were enrolled during 2014 to 2016. We calculated two weighted genetic risk scores as instrumental variables for type 2 diabetes and body mass index (BMI). These scores were used to measure the causal relationships of diabetes and BMI with lipid profiles that included total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides (TGs).ResultsThe causal regression coefficients (βIV) of genetically determined diabetes for the total cholesterol, LDL-C, and log10TG were 0.130 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.020, 0.240; P = 0.014], 0.125 (96% CI: 0.041, 0.209; P = 0.001), and 0.019 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.039; P = 0.055), respectively. The βIV for HDL-C was -0.008 (95% CI: -0.032. 0.016), which was not significant (P = 0.699). The causal regression coefficients of a genetically determined 10 kg/m2 increase in BMI for HDL-C and log10TG were -0.409 (96% CI: -0.698, -0.120; P = 0.004) and 0.227 (95% CI: 0.039, 0.415; P = 0.026), respectively. The βIVs for TGs and LDL-C were not significant.ConclusionsThis study has provided evidence for the biologically plausible causal effects of diabetes and adiposity by BMI on different elements of the lipid profile using Mendelian randomization analyses.