Abstract:Background The number of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) has significantly increased in the recent decade. Although uterine artery embolization (UAE) has been adopted to minimize the blood loss during uterine curettage removing of CSP, massive bleeding and uterine rupture can still be frequently encountered. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a novel combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy technique with the traditional curettage in removing the conceptus and repairing the incision defect following the UAE management of CSP. Methods The CSP patients (n = 58) diagnosed between March 1, 2005 and March 1, 2010 were enrolled in three medical centers in Shanghai, China. All of these patients have undergone intra-arterial methotrexate, UAE and one of the following treatments: combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy (study group, n = 25) and uterine curettage (control group, n = 33). Their medical records and 2-year outcomes were reviewed. The CSP removal rate, amount of blood loss during the treatment, incision repair rate (note: the post-curettage healing process of the incision defect was seen as a form of natural incision repairing, i.e., the self-repair mode), hospital stay, β-hCG regression time and postoperative sequelae were compared between two groups. Results The CSP removal rate in the study group (100%) was significantly higher than that (79%) in the control group (p = 0.024). The average blood loss was 78.0 mL in the study group, which was much less than the 258.5 mL (p = 0.004) in the control group. A satisfactory incision repair rate (96%) was achieved in the study group, while it was 25% (p < 0.001) in the control group. Moreover, the study group had significantly shorter hospital stays (p = 0.043) and β-hCG regression times (p = 0.033), lower rates of postoperative abdominal pain (p = 0.035) and menstruation abnormalities (p = 0.043). Conclusions Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy is much safer and more effective than uterine curettage as a supplementary measure to remove the conceptus and repair the cesarean incision following the UAE management of CSP.

A Retrospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Adding Intra-Arterial Methotrexate Infusion to Uterine Artery Embolisation Followed by Curettage for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Methotrexate therapy for cesarean section scar pregnancy with and without suction curettage.

Retrospective Study Of Patients With Cesarean Scar Pregnancies Treated By Uterine Artery Chemoembolization And Curettage

Combined Laparoscopy and Hysteroscopy Vs. Uterine Curettage in the Uterine Artery Embolization-Based Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Cohort Study

Comparison of two treatment methods following uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients with caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP): laparoscopy/hysteroscopy-combined surgery versus uterine curettage

Caesarean Scar Pregnancy: Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Treatment by Uterine Artery Chemoembolization and Systemic Methotrexate Injection.

Uterine Artery Embolization Compared with Uterine Artery Embolization/Methotrexate Plus Curettage in the Conservative Treatment for Patient with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

The Effects of Methotrexate and Uterine Arterial Embolization in Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

The efficiency of uterine artery embolization in treating cesarean scar pregnancy

Methotrexate-Based Bilateral Uterine Arterial Chemoembolization for Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Dilatation and Curettage after Uterine Artery Embolization versus Methotrexate Injection for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience

Uterine Artery Embolization Combined with Local Methotrexate and Systemic Methotrexate for Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy with Different Ultrasonographic Pattern

Uterine artery embolization combined with methotrexate in the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: results of a case series and review of the literature.

Inquisition of Treatment Methods of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Analysis on Clinical Effects of Dilation and Curettage Guided by Ultrasonography Versus Hysteroscopy after Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Uterine artery embolization followed by dilation and curettage within 24 hours compared with systemic methotrexate for cesarean scar pregnancy.

Bilateral Uterine Artery Chemoembolization with Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy

Incorporating Uterine Artery Embolization in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Following Diagnostic Ultrasonography

Combined laparoscopy and hysteroscopy vs. uterine curettage in the uterine artery embolization-based management of cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study

Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Series

Intra-arterial infusion of MTX for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a comparative study between different doses