Abstract:Introduction: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is utilized early after soft tissue injury to promote tissue granulation and wound contraction. Early post-injury transfers via aeromedical evacuation (AE) to definitive care centers may actually induce wound bacterial proliferation. However, the effectiveness of NPWT or instillation NPWT in limiting bacterial proliferation during post-injury AE has not been studied. We hypothesized that instillation NPWT during simulated AE would decrease bacterial colonization within simple and complex soft tissue wounds. Methods: The porcine models were anesthetized before any experiments. For the simple tissue wound model, two 4-cm dorsal wounds were created in 34.9 ± 0.6 kg pigs and were inoculated with Acinetobacter baumannii (AB) or Staphylococcus aureus 24 hours before a 4-hour simulated AE or ground control. During AE, animals were randomized to one of the five groups: wet-to-dry (WTD) dressing, NPWT, instillation NPWT with normal saline (NS-NPWT), instillation NPWT with Normosol-R® (NM-NPWT), and RX-4-NPWT with the RX-4 system. For the complex musculoskeletal wound, hind-limb wounds in the skin, subcutaneous tissue, peroneus tertius muscle, and tibia were created and inoculated with AB 24 hours before simulated AE with WTD or RX-4-NPWT dressings. Blood samples were collected at baseline, pre-flight, and 72 hours post-flight for inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Wound biopsies were obtained at 24 hours and 72 hours post-flight, and the bacteria were quantified. Vital signs were measured continuously during simulated AE and at each wound reassessment. Results: No significant differences in hemodynamics or serum cytokines were noted between ground or simulated flight groups or over time in either wound model. Simulated AE alone did not affect bacterial proliferation compared to ground controls. The simple tissue wound arm demonstrated a significant decrease in Staphylococcus aureus and AB colony-forming units at 72 hours after simulated AE using RX-4-NPWT. NS-NPWT during AE more effectively prevented bacterial proliferation than the WTD dressing. There was no difference in colony-forming units among the various treatment groups at the ground level. Conclusion: The hypoxic, hypobaric environment of AE did not independently affect the bacterial growth after simple tissue wound or complex musculoskeletal wound. RX-4-NPWT provided the most effective bacterial reduction following simulated AE, followed by NS-NPWT. Future research will be necessary to determine ideal instillation fluids, negative pressure settings, and dressing change frequency before and during AE.

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces the Motility of Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and Enhances Wound Healing in a Rabbit Ear Biofilm Infection Model

Early Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Acute Wounds Contaminated with Staphylococcus Aureus: an Effective Approach to Preventing Biofilm Formation.

Impact Of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy On Bacterial Behaviour And Bioburden In A Contaminated Full-Thickness Wound

Adaptive expression of biofilm regulators and adhesion factors of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> during acute wound infection under the treatment of negative pressure wound therapy <i>in vivo</i>

Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Enhances Local Inflammatory Responses in Acute Infected Soft-Tissue Wound

Effect of negative pressure on growth, secretion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus

Negative pressure wound therapy decreases mortality in a murine model of burn-wound sepsis involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Wound Healing.

Potential molecular mechanisms of negative pressure in promoting wound healing

Block Negative Pressure Drainage Combined with Local Oxygen for Ischemic Wound Healing of Rabbit Ears

Effectiveness of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy During Aeromedical Evacuation Following Soft Tissue Injury and Infection

Biological Effects And Clinical Application Of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: A Review

Advances in mechanisms of negative pressure wound therapy

[Advances in the Research of Molecular Mechanism of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Improving Wound Healing].

Circular RNA Expression Profiles Following Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Burn Wounds with Experimental Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection

Analysis of Blood Flow and Local Expression of Angiogenesis-Associated Growth Factors in Infected Wounds Treated with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

Treatment of acute and chronic osteomyelitis with negative pressure wound therapy

Bacteriostasis and healing effects of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy combined with Topical Oxygen Therapy for chronic wounds

The Infected Diabetic Foot: Does Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Irrigation Reduce Bioburden and Improve Wound Healing?

Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy on chronic wound healing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Accelerates Rats Diabetic Wound By Promoting Agenesis