Abstract:Alternatives to traditional categorical diagnoses have been proposed to improve the validity and utility of psychiatric nosology. This paper continues the companion review of an alternative model, the psychosis superspectrum of the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). The superspectrum model aims to describe psychosis-related psychopathology according to data on distributions and associations among signs and symptoms. The superspectrum includes psychoticism and detachment spectra as well as narrow subdimensions within them. Auxiliary domains of cognitive deficit and functional impairment complete the psychopathology profile. The current paper reviews evidence on this model from neurobiology, treatment response, clinical utility, and measure development. Neurobiology research suggests that psychopathology included in the superspectrum shows similar patterns of neural alterations. Treatment response often mirrors the hierarchy of the superspectrum with some treatments being efficacious for psychoticism, others for detachment, and others for a specific subdimension. Compared to traditional diagnostic systems, the quantitative nosology shows an approximately 2-fold increase in reliability, explanatory power, and prognostic accuracy. Clinicians consistently report that the quantitative nosology has more utility than traditional diagnoses, but studies of patients with frank psychosis are currently lacking. Validated measures are available to implement the superspectrum model in practice. The dimensional conceptualization of psychosis-related psychopathology has implications for research, clinical practice, and public health programs. For example, it encourages use of the cohort study design (rather than case-control), transdiagnostic treatment strategies, and selective prevention based on subclinical symptoms. These approaches are already used in the field, and the superspectrum provides further impetus and guidance for their implementation. Existing knowledge on this model is substantial, but significant gaps remain. We identify outstanding questions and propose testable hypotheses to guide further research. Overall, we predict that the more informative, reliable, and valid characterization of psychopathology offered by the superspectrum model will facilitate progress in research and clinical care.

Uncertainty Theory: A Powerful Approach to Understanding Psychiatric Disorder

Transdiagnostic computations of uncertainty: towards a new lens on intolerance of uncertainty

A Dynamical Systems View of Psychiatric Disorders—Theory

Understanding anxiety through uncertainty quantification

Reconceptualizing Schizophrenia.

Rethinking the Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: Data-Driven Psychological Dimensions, Not Categories, as a Framework for Mental-Health Research, Treatment, and Training

The role of intolerance of uncertainty in classical threat conditioning: Recent developments and directions for future research

Subjectivity and Severe Psychiatric Disorders.

Intolerance of uncertainty and psychosis: A systematic review

Conceptualizing a less paranoid schizophrenia

Towards a Biopsychosocial Psychiatry.

A Dynamical Systems View of Psychiatric Disorders—Practical Implications

Utilizing a transdiagnostic neuroscience-informed approach to differentiate the components of a complex clinical presentation: A case report

Novel Approaches Toward Studying Change: Implications for Understanding and Treating Psychopathology

Epistemic Trust: a Keyword for Contemporary Clinical Practice and Psychopathology

Distinct computational mechanisms of uncertainty processing explain opposing exploratory behaviors in anxiety and apathy

How Physicians Manage Medical Uncertainty: A Qualitative Study and Conceptual Taxonomy

A Trans-Diagnostic Perspective on Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Refining Mishel’s Reconceptualized Uncertainty in Illness Theory: Explaining the Development of Uncertainty in Chronic Illness

Psychosis superspectrum II: neurobiology, treatment, and implications

Subjective experiences of schizophrenia: toward a new dynamic psychiatry--II.