Adjuvant Treatment May Benefit Patients With High-Risk Upper Rectal Cancer: A Nomogram And Recursive Partitioning Analysis Of 547 Patients

Xin Wang,Jing Jin,Yong Yang,Wen-Yang Liu,Hua Ren,Yan-Ru Feng,Qin Xiao,Ning Li,Lei Deng,Hui Fang,Hao Jing,Ning-Ning Lu,Yu Tang,Jian-Yang Wang,Shu-Lian Wang,Wei-Hu Wang,Yong-Wen Song,Yue-Ping Liu,Ye-Xiong Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10718
2016-01-01
Oncotarget
Abstract:Purpose: The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) or adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in treating patients with locally advanced upper rectal cancer (URC) after total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery remains unclear. We developed a clinical nomogram and a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA)-based risk stratification system for predicting 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) to determine whether these individuals require ACRT or ACT. Materials andMethods: This retrospective analysis included 547 patients with primary URC. A nomogram was developed based on the Cox regression model. The performance of the model was assessed by concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve in internal validation with bootstrapping. RPA stratified patients into risk groups based on their tumor characteristics.Results: Five independent prognostic factors (age, preoperative increased carcinoembryonic antigen and carcinoma antigen 19-9, positive lymph node [PLN] number, tumor deposit [TD], pathological T classification) were identified and entered into the predictive nomogram. The bootstrap-corrected C-index was 0.757. RPA stratification of the three prognostic groups showed obviously different prognosis. Only the high-risk group (patients with PLN = 6 and TD, or PLN > 6) benefited from ACRT plus ACT when compared with surgery followed by ACRT or ACT, and surgery alone (5-year CSS: 70.8% vs. 57.8% vs. 15.6%, P < 0.001).Conclusions: Our nomogram predicts 5-year CSS after TME surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer and RPA-based stratification indicates that ACRT plus ACT post-surgery may be an important treatment plan with potentially significant survival advantages in high-risk URC. This may help to select candidates of adjuvant treatment in prospective studies.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?