Abstract:Dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) has been proved to be closely related to human social behavior. In particular, many studies have found that it interacts with family environment on prosocial behavior. However, there are some critical imperfection in current researches: 1) Most of the related researches focus on DRD4 7 repeat allele (DRD4-7R), while in fact there are great racial differences in the variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) polymorphism of DRD4. In Asian population, the highest frequency of allele is DRD4 4 repeat allele (DRD4-4R). 2) There are three models to explain the interaction between DRD4 polymorphism and environmental factors on social behavior: diathesis-stress model, differential susceptibility model and vantage sensitivity model. The latter two models are supported by more evidences, but show inconsistent conclusions. 3) The main analysis method of the above interaction is hierarchical regression, which is simple and easy, however, with noticeable disadvantages. This method only focuses on the two ends of environment variables, and does not set quantitative standards for the size of interaction effects. To solve this problem, Roisman et al. proposed the region of significance (RoS) method, and Widaman et al. proposed a re-parameterized regression model. 4) Since gender is the influencing factor of the relationship between DRD4 and social behavior, in the interaction between DRD4 and family factors on social behavior, does gender effect still exist? If it does, is it a gender-contingent effect or a gender-specific effect? This study explored the interaction of DRD4 gene polymorphism and family cohesion or conflict on prosocial tendencies of university students, and analyzed whether the interaction fitted the differential susceptibility model or not, using RoS method and the re-parameterized regression model. Because of the similar function of DRD4-2R and DRD4-7R, the individuals carrying at least one DRD4-2R and the individuals carrying at least one DRD4-7R were combines as DRD4-2R (7R). Thus, there were two family sensitive gene types in this study: DRD4-2R(7R) and non-DRD4-4R. The findings indicated that: 1) For male university students, the interactions between DRD4-2R(7R) and family conflict on altruistic prosocial tendency, non-DRD4-4R and family cohesion on anonymous prosocial tendency, non-DRD4-4R and family conflict on altruistic prosocial tendency, and DRD4-3R(5R/6R) and family cohesion on anonymous prosocial tendency were significant. In other words, compared with non-carriers, family cohesion or conflict could significantly predict the prosocial tendency of male DRD4-2R(7R), non-DRD4-4R or DRD4-3R(5R/6R) carriers. Therefore, there was significant interaction between DRD4 gene polymorphism and family environment on prosocial tendencies of university students, and this interaction was gender-specific. 2) These four interactions fitted the differential susceptibility model whether through RoS method or the re-parameterized regression model. This study will be helpful to promote people's dynamic understanding of the prosocial development of the youth, and has some inspiration to improve the family education environment. Further research should pay attention to the longitudinal research design, the interaction of multiple genes and other environmental factors.

[Association Between Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene Exon III 48bp VNTR Polymorphism and Temperament in School-Aged Children].

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Temperament Development Across the Preschool Period.

[Transmission Disequilibrium Test of DRD4 Exon III 48bp Variant Number Tandem Repeat Polymorphism and Tic Disorder].

QTL association analysis of the DRD4 exon 3 VNTR polymorphism in a population sample of children screened with a parent rating scale for ADHD symptoms

Relationship of the Functional Polymorphism of Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene with Behavioral Problems in School-Age Twins

[Association Between Rs1079595 Polymorphisms in the DRD2 Gene and the Distractibility Based the Temperament in School-Age Children].

[Association Studies of Dopamine D4 Receptor Gene and Dopamine Transporter Gene Polymorphisms in Han Chinese Patients with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder].

Association Analysis of Dopamine D_4 Receptor Gene and Serotonin Transporter Promoter Gene Polymorphisms with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Related Symptomatology

Association study of DRD4 exonⅢ48 bp variable number of tandem repeats polymorphism and tic disorder

Association of DRD4 polymorphism with severity of oppositional defiant disorder, separation anxiety disorder and repetitive behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorder

Family-based Association Study of DRD4 Gene in Methylphenidate-Responded Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Association Between Rs1079727 Polymorphism in the DRD2 Gene and the Distractibility in the School-Age Children

Relationship between dopamine receptor D4 exon Ⅲ polymorphism and aggressive behavior and psychiatric symptoms in schizophrenia

The Interaction Between DRD4 Gene Rs1800955 Polymorphism and Negative Life Events on the Personality Characteristics of Mongolian Adolescents

Candidate transmission disequilibrium analysis for quantitative traits in tourette syndrome in a chinese family trio sample

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity Disorder and Dopamine Receptor D4 (DRD4) Exon 3 Variable Number of Tandem Repeats (VNTR) 2-Repeat Allele

The interactions of dopamine D4 receptor and family cohesion or conflict on university students' prosocial tendency

[Schizophrenia and Dopamine D4 Gene Polymorphism in Chinese Population: Association Analysis].

Association analysis of dopamine D4 receptor gene polymorphism with ADHD and related symptomatology

Relationship between VNTR polymorphisms of the human dopamine transporter gene and expression in post-mortem midbrain tissue

Association of maternal dopamine transporter genotype with negative parenting: evidence for gene x environment interaction with child disruptive behavior