Abstract:Objective The widely use of ultrasound elastography has increased the detection rate of breast cancer.It has great advantage of differential diagnosis of breast tumor.Our study is to evaluate and compare the value of the quantitative ultrasound elastography parameters of AR ( area ratio) , ESR ( entire strain ratio) , LSR ( locolized strain ratio) , EFLR( entire fat to lesion ratio) and LFLR( locolized fat to lesion ratio) in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor. Methods 110 patients with 113 breast tumors were collected from Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Region between January 2015 and January 2016 who underwent breast exami-nation.The tumors were divided into two groups according to patholo-gy which acts as gold standard:benign group with 59 lesions and ma-lignant group with 54 lesions.Participants underwent quantitative ul-trasound elastography parameters examination.AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR、LFLR were compared between benign group and malignant group and ROC curve was drawn.Conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography parameter are combined to differentiate the benign or malignant lesion.Calculate the various parameters on the accuracy、susceptibility、specificity、positive likelihood ratio、negative likeli-hood ratio of the diagnosis of benign and malignant lesions, and determine the quantitative parameter with the highest accuracy. Results The mean value of AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR of malignant lesions were all significantly greater than that of benign le-sions (P=0.000).Compared with the conventional ultrasound, AR、ESR、LSR、EFLR and LFLR have higher AUC in the differentia-tion of benign and malignant breast lesions;AUC of AR and ESR are higher than conventional ultrasound、LSR、EFLR and LFLR( P<0.000).Compared with conventional ultrasound(1.523) alone, conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR、ESR、EFLR and LFLR have higher positive likelihood ratio(11.581、8.272、3.482、2.458、2.100) in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity(P<0.000).The AUC of conventional ultrasound combined separately with AR and ESR[0.940(0.890~0.990)、0.941(0.891~0.990)] were higher than conventional ultrasound and conventional ultrasound com-bined separately with LSR、EFLR、LFLR[0.669(0.669~0.768)、0.837(0.759~0.915)、0.763(0.673~0.852)、0.787(0.701~0.874)],so as accuracy、susceptibility、specificity and positive likelihood ratio(P<0.000). Conclusion Quantitative ultrasound elastography may be helpful in differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions, especially combining conventional ultrasound with AR and ESR, which were superior to combining with the other parameters and provide a more objective and credible basis to differenti-ate benign and malignant breast tumors with conventional ultrasound.

Elastosonography and Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer

Value of elastography combined with conventional ultrasound in diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients

Can Combined Screening of Ultrasound and Elastography Improve Breast Cancer Identification Compared with MRI in Women with Dense Breasts-a Multicenter Prospective Study

Role of Elastography in Axillary Examination of Patients With Breast Cancer.

Application of Real-time Elastography Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients

[Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis by Using Radiomics of Dual-modal Ultrasound Composed of Elastography and B-mode].

Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative and Qualitative Elastography for Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Dual-modal Computer-Assisted Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients on Both Real-Time Elastography and B-mode Ultrasound

Breast cancer: comparison of quantitative dual-layer spectral CT and axillary ultrasonography for preoperative diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes

Evaluation of diagnosis of breast tumors with two-dimensional ultrasound and ultrasonic elastography

Semi-quantitative Analysis of EBUS Elastography as a Feasible Approach in Diagnosing Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Nodes of Lung Cancer Patients

Diagnostic Value of Elastosonography for Thyroid Microcarcinoma.

Evaluation of Whole Axillary Status with Lymphatic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Patients with Breast Cancer

Effectiveness of Quantitative Shear Wave Elastography for the Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis

Evaluation of the ultrasonographic features of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer]

Differential diagnosis of strain ratio measurement of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer

Ultrasound as a replacement for physical examination in clinical staging of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients

The differentiation of malignant and benign lesions of the breast by quantitative Ultrasound elastography

Diagnostic efficiency of ultrasound elastography combined with conventional ultrasonography for breast neoplasm

Value of Combined Application of Ultrasonic Elastography and Conventional Ultrasonography in the Differen tial Diagnosis of Breast Lesions

Association and predictive value of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound features with axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer