Abstract:Objective\r\nTo explore the differences and correlation between the target volumes based on deformation registration (DIR) using preoperative prone diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and postoperative prone computed tomography (CT) simulation imaging for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS).\r\n\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nEighteen breast cancer patients suitable for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI) after BCS were enrolled. Preoperative prone diagnostic MR and postoperative prone CT scan sets were acquired during free breathing for all patients. The gross tumor volume (GTV) delineated on the preoperative diagnostic MR images was defined as GTVMRI, the clinical target volumes (CTVMRI+ 1 and CTVMRI+ 2)were defined as 10 and 20 mm margins around the GTVMRI, and the planning target volume (PTVMRI+ 1 and PTVMRI+ 2) were defined as 15 and 25 mm margins around the GTVMRI, respectively. Tumor bed (TB) delineated on the postoperative prone CT simulation images acquired during free breathing was defined as GTVTB, CTV and PTV were defined as 10 and 15 mm margins around the GTVTB, respectively. The target volume of the whole breast contoured on the MR and CT images were defined as CTVBreast-MRI and CTVBreast-CI, respectively. The MR and CT images were registered deformably in MIM software system.\r\n\r\n\r\nResults\r\nThe GTVTB, CTVTB and PTVTB were significantly greater than GTVMRI, GTVMRI+ 1 and PTVMRI+ 1, respectively (Z=-3.593, -3.593, -2.983, P\u003c0.05). Meanwhile, the CTVTB and PTVTB were significantly less than the CTVMRI+ 2 and PTVMRI+ 2, respectively(Z=-2.722, -2.853, P\u003c0.05). The conformal index (CI) and degree of inclusion (DI) of GTVTB-GTVMRI, GTVTB-CTVMRI+ 1, CTVTB-GTVMRI and CTVTB-GTVMRI+ 1 based on center-coincidence of the compared targets were better than those based on DIR of the thorax(Z=-3.724、-3.724、-2.591、-3.593, P\u003c0.05; Z=-3.724、-3.724、-3.201、-3.724, P\u003c0.05).\r\n\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nFor the patients enrolled for prone EB-PBI, target volumes delineated on the preoperative prone MR images were significantly smaller compared to that on the postoperative prone CT images, but a statistically significant positive correlation was found between the MR and CT target volumes. There were still relatively poor spatial overlap whether for the whole breast or the targets between the preoperative prone diagnostic MR images and the postoperative prone simulation CT images based on DIR. Therefore, it is infeasible to guide postoperative EB-PBI target delineation using the preoperative prone diagnostic MR images.\r\n\r\n\r\nKey words: \r\nPreoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance image; Postoperative prone computed tomography simulation image; Deformable image registration; Target volume comparison; External-beam partial breast irradiation

Comparison of rigid and deformable registration through the respiratory phases of four-dimensional computed tomography image data sets for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery.

A comparison of rigid and deformable image registration at end-inhale and end-exhale phases based on 4DCT images for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

A Comparative Study Based on Deformable Image Registration of the Target Volumes for External-Beam Partial Breast Irradiation Defined Using Preoperative Prone Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Postoperative Prone Computed Tomography Imaging.

Improving Deformable Image Registration with Point Metric and Masking Technique for Postoperative Breast Cancer Radiotherapy.

Geometric evaluation and quantifying dosimetric impact of diverse deformable image registration algorithms on abdomen images with biomechanically modeled deformations

A comparative study of target volumes based on deformation registration using preoperative prone magnetic resonance imaging and postoperative prone computed tomography imaging for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery

Deformable Image Registration Based Automatic Ct-To-Ct Contour Propagation for Head and Neck Adaptive Radiotherapy in the Routine Clinical Setting

Analysis of the Setup Errors of Medical Image Registration-Based Cone-Beam Ct for Lung Cancer

SU-F-P-54: Guidelines to Check Image Registration QA of a Clinical Deformation Registration Software: A Single Institution Preliminary Study

Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast‐conserving surgery

Registration of On-Board X-ray Images with 4DCT: A Proposed Method of Phase and Setup Verification for Gated Radiotherapy

Assessing cumulative dose distributions in combined external beam radiotherapy and intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer by treatment planning based on deformable image registration

SU-E-J-109: Evaluation of Deformable Accumulated Parotid Doses Using Different Registration Algorithms in Adaptive Head and Neck Radiotherapy

Deformable Image Registration of CT Images for Automatic Contour Propagation in Radiation Therapy.

SU‐F‐J‐98: Improvement and Evaluation of Deformation Image Registration on Parotid Glands During Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Cancer

Utilization of a Hybrid Finite-Element Based Registration Method to Quantify Heterogeneous Tumor Response for Adaptive Treatment for Lung Cancer Patients

Evaluation of Dosimetric Variance in Whole Breast Forward Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Based on 4D CT and 3D CT.

Evaluation of the Block Matching deformable registration algorithm in the field of head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy

A contour-guided deformable image registration algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy

The application of multiple metrics in deformable image registration for target volume delineation of breast tumor bed

Evaluation of cumulative dose distributions from external beam radiation therapy using CT‐to‐CBCT deformable image registration (DIR) for cervical cancer patients