Abstract:Background Voriconazole has been recommended as primary treatment for patients with invasive aspergillosis. Intravenous and tablet formulations of posaconazole that have improved systemic absorption could be an effective alternative to voriconazole. We aimed to assess non-inferiority of posaconazole to voriconazole for the primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Methods We did a randomised, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial comparing posaconazole (intravenous or oral posaconazole 300 mg twice on day 1, followed by 300 mg once a day for days 2-84) with voriconazole (6 mg/kg intravenous or 300 mg oral twice on day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg intravenously or 200 mg orally twice a day for days 2-84) for 12 weeks or less in the primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis. Participants were from 91 study sites in 26 countries, were aged 13 years or older, weighed at least 40 kg, and met criteria for proven, probable, or possible fungal disease. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated randomisation schedule with stratification by risk status. The primary endpoint was cumulative all-cause mortality up until day 42 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (defined as randomly assigned participants who received >= 1 dose of study drug), with a 10% non-inferiority margin. The ITT population was also evaluated for safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01782131, and EudraCT, 2011-003938-14. Findings Between Oct 25, 2013, and Sept 10, 2019, of 653 individuals assessed for eligibility, 575 ITT participants were randomly assigned and received one or more doses of study drug (n=288 [50%] posaconazole, n=287 [50%] voriconazole). Mortality up until day 42 was 15% (44 of 288) in the posaconazole group and 21% (59 of 287) in the voriconazole group (treatment difference -5.3% [95% CI -11.6 to 1.0]; p<0.0001). Mortality up until day 42 in the full- analysis-set subpopulation (ITT participants with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis) supported this conclusion: 31 (19%) of 163 participants in the posaconazole group and 32 (19%) of 171 participants in the voriconazole group (treatment difference 0.3% [95% CI -8.2 to 8.8]). The most frequently reported treatmentrelated adverse events (incidence >3%) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), nausea, hypokalaemia, and vomiting in the posaconazole group and increased ALT, AST, or alkaline phosphatase, hallucination, increased gamma-glutamyltransferase peptidase, nausea, and blurred vision in the voriconazole group. The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse event rates in the ITT population was 30% for posaconazole and 40% for voriconazole (treatment difference - 10. 2% [95% CI -17 .9 to - 2.4]). Interpretation Posaconazole was non-inferior to voriconazole for all-cause mortality up until day 42 in participants with invasive aspergillosis. Posaconazole was well tolerated, and participants had fewer treatment-related adverse events than in the voriconazole group. This study supports the use of posaconazole as a first-line treatment for the condition.

Fluconazole Versus Mould-Active Triazoles for Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Clinical Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Short-Course Rather Than Low-Dose Amphotericin B May Exert Potential Influence on Mortality in Cryptococcal Meningitis Patients Treated with Amphotericin B Plus Flucytosine Alone or in Combination with Fluconazole

Posaconazole Vs. Fluconazole As Invasive Fungal Infection Prophylaxis in China: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study

Real-world assessment of the effectiveness of posaconazole for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in hematological patients A retrospective observational study

Fluconazole is as effective as other anti-mold agents in preventing early invasive fungal disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: assessment of antifungal therapy in haematological disease in China.

Bendamustine versus chlorambucil in treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in China: a randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled, phase III clinical trial

The cost–utility analysis of antifungal prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in acute myeloid leukaemia patients receiving chemotherapy: a study from a middle-income country

A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Posaconazole Vs Fluconazole in the Prophylaxis of Invasive Fungal Infection in a Chinese Population

Network meta-analysis of triazole, polyene, and echinocandin antifungal agents in invasive fungal infection prophylaxis in patients with hematological malignancies

Posaconazole versus voriconazole as antifungal prophylaxis for invasive fungal diseases in patients with hematological malignancies

Oral Posaconazole or Intravenous-Oral Itraconazole in Preventing Invasive Fungal Diseases for Patients with Acute Leukemia

Invasive fungal disease and antifungal prophylaxis in children with acute leukaemia: a multicentre retrospective Australian cohort study

Economic Evaluation of Posaconazole Versus Fluconazole or Itraconazole in the Prevention of Invasive Fungal Infection in High-Risk Neutropenic Patients in Sweden

[Primary Antifungal Prophylaxis with Posaconazole Plays a Pivotal Role During Chemotherapy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia].

Comparison of Antifungal Prophylaxis Drugs in Patients with Hematological Disease or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Posaconazole versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive aspergillosis: a phase 3, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Caspofungin Versus Voriconazole in the Empirical Antifungal Therapy of Febrile Neutropenia in China

Choosing Optimal Antifungal Agents to Prevent Fungal Infections in Nonneutropenic Critically Ill Patients: Trial Sequential Analysis, Network Meta-analysis, and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis

Effectiveness analysis of fluconazole prophylaxis of fungus infection in patients with hematological diseases

Prophylaxis with itraconazole is more effective than prophylaxis with fluconazole in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

Economic Evaluation of Caspofungin vs. Voriconazole in Initial Empirical Antifungal Therapy of Febrile Neutropenia