Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Levetiracetam Extended-Release Tablets and Relative Bioavailability Compared with Immediate-Release Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Meng Wang,Mengmeng Wang,Quanying Zhang,Shunlin Zong,Chengzhe Lv
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13318-018-0461-2
2018-01-01
European Journal of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
Abstract:Background and Objectives Levetiracetam is a second-generation antiepileptic drug and distributed ubiquitously in the central nervous system. The extended-release formulation of levetiracetam was developed to provide patients with the convenience of once-daily dosing, to improve drug compliance and tolerability. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of levetiracetam extended-release (ER) tablets in healthy Chinese subjects following single and multiple doses. Methods Two panels of 34 healthy subjects were enrolled. Trial 1 was a two-way crossover between levetiracetam ER tablets and immediate-release (IR) tablets under fasting conditions. Trial 2 was a four-way crossover single-dose study between levetiracetam ER fasted and ER with food. Results Intake of single and multiple levetiracetam ER tablets resulted in a 42.3% lower maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) and a 33.6% lower minimum steady-state plasma concentration ( C ss min ) than IR tablet intake, while the median time to C max ( t max ) was significantly delayed. The 90% CI of the ER/IR ratios for area under the curve (AUC) from zero to last measurable sample (AUC 0– t ), AUC from zero to infinity (AUC 0– ∞ ), AUC at steady state (AUC ss , τ = 24 h), C max at steady state ( C ss max ) and average concentration at steady state ( C ss av ) were contained within the 80–125% range of bioequivalence. The C max and AUC were dose proportional across the dose cohorts. Following a high-fat meal, levetiracetam ER tablets resulted in a 14.4% higher C max . The 90% confidence interval (CIs) of the fed/fasted ratios for C max and AUC were entirely contained within the 80–125% range of bioequivalence acceptance, except the t max was delayed ( P < 0.05). The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, dizziness and thirst. Conclusions After single and multiple doses, the absorption of levetiracetam ER was equal to IR, the t max was significantly delayed, and the C max and C ss min were significantly decreased. Food did not affect the absorption of the levetiracetam ER tablet, but the C max increased and the t max was delayed. The levetiracetam ER tablet was well tolerated and found to be dose proportional from 500 to 2000 mg in healthy Chinese subjects.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?