Abstract:Aim: To explore the processing mechanism of human brain for orientation conflict with event related potential technique. Methods: Totally 10 un dergraduate students who were studying for Bachelor's degree (six males, 21-24 years) from Capital University of Medical Sciences were enrolled as healthy examinees (after signed the informed consent) to observe the response of human brain for orientation conflict. Paired pictures as visual stimuli (S1 and S2) presented sequentially in the computer screen in front of the subjects. S1 and S2 were the same orientated left (condition 1); paired stimuli were both orientated right (condition 2); Above two conditions were paired state. S1 was orientated left and S2 was orientated right (condition 3); S1 was orientated right and S2 was orientated left (condition 4); Latter two conditions were conflict state. Subjects were required to judge whether S2 was the same orientation to S1 under the four conditions, while event related potentials were recorded on their scalps and stored on a hard disk at the same time of stimulating given by American Neuroscan brain-electricity evoked potential workstation. Mean voltage at different state was compared after disposal with off-line analysis. Res ults: Experimental data of 10 examinees were involved in the analysis statistics. 1 Reaction times of the 4 states (condition 1, 2, 3 and 4) were (577±161) ms, (581±173) ms, (586±100) ms and (594±103) ms with the accuracy of 99%, which had insignificant diference [F(1.9)=8.94, P > 0.05]; [F (1.9)=13.87, P > 0.05]. 2 Following the onset of S2, ERP components P100, N170, N200 and P300 were recorded in all conditions while in orientation conflicting conditions, N270 was evoked after an enlarged P100, it was mainly distributed at centra-frontal area. 3 Average wave amplitude was analyzed in the four conditions with double factor analysis of variance: There was no significant difference in the mean amplitude of event related potential components neither between the paired conditions nor the two conflict conditions. The mean amplitudes of P100 at parieto-occipital area and P300 at right frontal area in conflict conditions were significantly more positive than those of in paired conditions. The mean amplitude of N270 at right centro-temporal area exceeded that of at the left in conflict conditions, and the mean amplitude of P300 at left parietal area exceeded that of at the right in match conditions while the asymmetry was absent in conflict conditions. Conclusion: A significantly negative wave -N270 can be elicited after fortified P100 (P1) when the irritative direction is different. Fore head of wave amplitude is huge. The orientation information conflict can induce the production of N270.

Automatic Conflict Monitoring by Event-Related Potentials Could Be Used to Estimate Visual Acuity Levels

The Automatic Processing of Visual Information at Different Visual Acuity Levels: an ERP Study

[Effect of Different Attentional Conditions on ERP Detection of Visual Acuity].

Forensic Application of Objective Assessment on Visual Acuity by ERP

[An Event-Related Potential Study the on Information Processing of Binocular Disparity in Random-Dot Stereogram].

Forensic Study on Objective Evaluation of Visual Acuity of Ametropia with the Event-related Potential P3

ERP Component Analysis for Rapid Image Searching in Finer Categories

Configural and featural face processing are differently modulated by attentional resources at early stages: an event-related potential study with rapid serial visual presentation.

The Magnitude of the Central Visual Field Could Be Detected by Active Middle-Late Processing of ERPs

Tracking the mismatch information in visual short term memory: an event-related potential study.

The Tactile-Visual Conflict Processing and Its Modulation by Tactile-Induced Emotional States: an Event-Related Potential Study.

Event related potential induced by orientation information conflict

Evaluation of Visual Acuity of Ametropia with Visual Event-Related Potential Nogo-P3 Component

Mind the Visual Discomfort: Assessing Event-Related Potentials as Indicators for Visual Strain in Head-Mounted Displays

Emotional conflict occurs at an early stage: Evidence from the emotional face–word Stroop task

Differences in the emotional conflict task between individuals with high and low social adjustment: An ERP study

The neural dynamics of conflict adaptation induced by conflict observation: Evidence from univariate and multivariate analysis

Cognitive Conflict in Audiovisual Integration: an Event-Related Potential Study.

Differences in the Neural Basis of Automatic Auditory and Visual Time Perception: ERP Evidence from an Across-Modal Delayed Response Oddball Task

Emotional Conflict in Facial Expression Processing During Scene Viewing: an ERP Study

ERP Study on the Discomfort Induced by Size Mismatch Between Left View and Right View