Circulating Blood Biomarkers and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Danielle Carole Roy,Tzu-Fei Wang,Ronda Lun,Amin Zahrai,Ranjeeta Mallick,Dylan Burger,Gabriele Zitikyte,Steven Hawken,Philip Wells
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2330-1371
2024-06-14
Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Abstract:Background Cancer patients have an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Currently, the availability of highly discriminatory prediction models for VTE in cancer patients is limited. The implementation of biomarkers in prediction models might lead to refined VTE risk prediction. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate candidate biomarkers and their association with cancer-associated VTE. Methods We searched Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central for studies that evaluated biomarkers in adult cancer patients from inception to September 2022. We included studies reporting on VTE after a cancer diagnosis with biomarker measurements performed at a defined time point. Median/mean differences (for continuous measures) and odds ratios (for dichotomous measures) with 95% confidence intervals were estimated and pooled using random-effects models. Results We included 113 studies in the systematic review. Of these, 50 studies were included in the meta-analysis. We identified two biomarkers at cancer diagnosis (factor VIII and time to peak thrombin), three biomarkers pre-chemotherapy (D-dimer, fibrinogen, and mean platelet volume), and one biomarker preoperatively (platelet count) that had significant median or mean differences. Additionally, we found that hemoglobin 11 × 10 9 /L were significantly associated with future VTE risk only when measured at cancer diagnosis. Pre-chemotherapy neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥3 and preoperative platelet count ≥400 × 10 9 /L were also found to be associated with future VTE risk. Conclusion In conclusion, this study identified nine candidate blood biomarkers that may help in optimizing VTE prediction in cancer patients that should be further explored in future studies. Corresponding author for the article has access to all the data and takes responsibility for the analyses conducted as part of this study. D.C.R., T.-F.W., R.M., and P.W. designed the research question. D.C.R., T.-F.W., A.Z., R.M., and P.W. designed the eligibility criteria and the screening strategy. D.C.R., T.-F.W., R.L., A.Z., R.M., P.W., and S.H. came up with the data extraction items. D.C.R., T.-F.W., A.Z., R.M., and P.W. developed the data synthesis strategy. D.C.R., T.-F.W., A.Z., R.M., and P.W. drafted the protocol manuscript, and it was reviewed and approved by all authors. D.C.R. and R.L. extracted the data. D.C.R., R.M., G.Z., and S.H. aided with data analysis. D.C.R. and G.Z. completed the ROB assessments. D.C.R., T.-F.W., R.M., D.B., S.H., and P.W. interpreted the results. All authors reviewed the results, proofread and approved the final version of the manuscript. * These authors are co-senior authors. Received: 18 October 2023 Accepted: 19 May 2024 Accepted Manuscript online: 20 May 2024 Article published online: 12 June 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
peripheral vascular disease,hematology