GABA Analogue HSK16149 in Chinese Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial
Xiaohui Guo,Tingting Zhang,Geheng Yuan,Weifang Zeng,Qingyuan Hu,Jianhua Ma,Yukun Li,Hongmei Li,Yawei Zhang,Jie Liu,Fang Bian,Wei Zhang,Fang Zhang,Shuguang Pang,Ya Li,Xiaohong Wu,Xulei Tang,Keqin Zhang,Tianrong Pan,Honglin Hu,Zhifeng Cheng,Yanjun Wang,Jialin Gao,Jia Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25614
2024-08-01
Abstract:Importance: Many patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) experience inadequate relief, despite best available medical treatments. There are no approved and effective therapies for patients with DPNP in China. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capsules containing γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue HSK16149 in the treatment of Chinese patients with DPNP. Design, setting, and participants: This phase 2 to 3 adaptive randomized clinical trial was multicenter, double blind, and placebo and pregabalin controlled. The trial started on December 10, 2020, and concluded on July 8, 2022. In stage 1, various doses of HSK16149 were evaluated to determine safety and efficacy for stage 2. The second stage then validated the efficacy and safety of the recommended dose. Intervention: In stage 1, enrolled patients (n = 363) were randomized 1:1:1:1:1:1 to 4 HSK16149 doses (40, 80, 120, or 160 mg/d), pregabalin (300 mg/d), or placebo. In stage 2, patients (n = 362) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive HSK16149, 40 or 80 mg/d, or placebo. The final efficacy and safety analysis pooled data from patients receiving the same treatment. Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy end point in stage 1 was the change from baseline in average daily pain score (ADPS) at week 5. The primary efficacy end point in stage 2 was the change from baseline in ADPS at week 13. When the final statistical analysis was performed, the P values calculated from the independent data of each phase were combined using the weighted inverse normal method to make statistical inferences. Results: Of 725 randomized patients in the full-analysis set (393 men [54.2%]; mean [SD] age, 58.80 [9.53] years; 700 [96.6%] of Han Chinese ethnicity), 177 received placebo; 178, HSK16149, 40 mg/d; 179, HSK16149, 80 mg/d; 66, HSK16149, 120 mg/d; 63, HSK16149, 160 mg/d; and 62, pregabalin, 300 mg/d. A total of 644 patients (88.8%) completed the study. The 40- and 80-mg/d doses of HSK16149 were recommended in stage 2. At week 13, the ADPS mean (SD) change from baseline was -2.24 (1.55) for the 40-mg/d and -2.16 (1.79) for 80-mg/d groups and -1.23 (1.68) for the placebo group, showing statistical significance for both HSK16149 doses vs placebo (both P < .001). In a safety set (n = 726), 545 patients (75.1%) had adverse events, which were generally mild to moderate, with dizziness and somnolence being the most common. Conclusions and relevance: Forty- and eighty-mg/d doses of HSK16149 were recommended for treating patients with DPNP in China. The efficacy of HSK16149 capsules was superior to placebo in all groups for relieving DPNP and appeared well tolerated. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04647773.