Invasive Management Strategies And Antithrombotic Treatments In Patients With Non-St-Segment-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome In China Findings From The Improving Ccc Project (Care For Cardiovascular Disease In China)

Qing Yang,Ying Wang,Jing Liu,Jun Liu,Yongchen Hao,Sidney C. Smith,Yong Huo,Gregg C. Fonarow,Changsheng Ma,Junbo Ge,Kathryn A. Taubert,Louise Morgan,Yang Guo,Wei Wang,Yujie Zhou,Dong Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004750
2017-01-01
Abstract:Background-Early invasive strategies and antithrombotic treatments are key treatments of non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Few studies have examined the use of these strategies in patients with NSTE-ACS in China. This study aimed to assess the applications of invasive strategies and antithrombotic treatments in patients with NSTE-ACS and compare their outcomes.Methods and Results-A nationwide registry study, Improving CCC (Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China) ACS project, was launched in 2014 as a collaborative study of the American Heart Association and Chinese Society of Cardiology (CSC), with 142 participating hospitals reporting details of clinical management and outcomes of patients with NSTE-ACS. The use of invasive strategies and antithrombotic treatments was examined based on updated guidelines. Major adverse cardiovascular events were analyzed. A total of 9953 patients with NSTE-ACS were enrolled. Angiography was performed in 63.1% of these patients, and 58.2% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, 40.6% of patients did not undergo early risk assessment, and very-high-risk patients had the lowest proportion of PCI (41.7%). PCI was performed within recommended times in 11.1% of very-high-risk patients and 26.3% of high risk patients. Those who underwent PCI within 2 hours had higher mortality in high-risk and very-high-risk patients who received PCI. Early dual antiplatelet treatment was given in 88.3% of patients.Conclusions-There are notable differences between guideline recommendations and the clinical management of patients with NSTE-ACS in China. The reasons for very-high-risk NSTE-ACS patients not undergoing PCI, and the optimal timing of PCI, require further clarification.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?