Abstract:The stimulus-driven contribution to the allocation of attention is bottom-up attention. Although bottom-up selection is typically quick and potent, it remains unclear how bottom-up attention will be distributed when multiple salient stimuli are presented simultaneously and whether this distribution depends on awareness. Here we performed psychophysical and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments to examine these issues. In our experiments, each texture stimulus had a regular Manhattan grid of 13 × 37 low luminance bars, presented in the lower visual field on a dark screen. All bars were identically oriented except for the foreground region of 2 × 2 bars with another orientation. There were four different foregrounds with 0°, 25°, 50°, and 90° orientation contrasts between the foreground bars and the background bars. In each texture stimulus, a pair of foregrounds was centered in the lower left and lower right quadrants at 5.83° eccentricity, one of which was 90° foreground. Thus, there were three possible texture stimuli: 90° + 0°, 90° + 25°, and 90° + 50° in our experiments. Low- and high-contrast masks, which had the same grid as the texture stimuli, rendered the whole stimulus visible (Experiment 1) and invisible (Experiment 2, confirmed by a forced-choice test) to subjects, respectively. In the psychophysical experiment, the Posner cueing paradigm was adopted to measure the spatial cueing effect of 90° foreground on an orientation discrimination task and thus the other foreground (i.e., 0°, 25°, and 50°) served as the distractor. We found that, when orientation contrast of the distractor increased, both the cueing effect and the fMRI BOLD signal in areas V1–V4 of 90° foreground fell off monotonically in Experiment 1 (the “Gradient” mechanism), but was constant in Experiment 2 (the “Winner-take-all” mechanism). These findings indicate an awareness-dependent distribution of visual bottom-up attention in human visual areas.

Feedback from higher to lower visual areas for visual recognition may be weaker in the periphery: Glimpses from the perception of brief dichoptic stimuli.

The Flip Tilt Illusion: Visible in Peripheral Vision As Predicted by the Central-Peripheral Dichotomy

Interaction between central and peripheral vision: Influence of distance and spatial frequencies

Peripheral Vision is Mainly for Looking Rather Than Seeing.

Contextual Influence on Perceptual Judgment is Independent of the Eye of Origin of the Contextual Inputs: Implications for Extra-Striate Mechanisms

Contrast-Reversed Binocular Dot-Pairs In Random-Dot Stereograms For Depth Perception In Central Visual Field: Probing The Dynamics Of Feedforward-Feedback Processes In Visual Inference

Illusory Movement of Stationary Stimuli in the Visual Periphery: Evidence for a Strong Centrifugal Prior in Motion Processing.

Reversed Depth in Anticorrelated Random-Dot Stereograms and the Central-Peripheral Difference in Visual Inference.

Top-Down Control of Visual Perception: Attention in Natural Vision

Peripheral and central sensation: multisensory orienting and recognition across species.

Late disruption of central visual field disrupts peripheral perception of form and color

Face Perception Inherits Low-Level Binocular Adaptation.

Neural circuits for binocular vision: Ocular dominance, interocular matching, and disparity selectivity

Awareness-dependent Distribution of Visual Bottom-up Attention

Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons

Learning to see the Ebbinghaus illusion in the periphery reveals a top-down stabilization of size perception across the visual field

The Effect of Spatial Structure on Binocular Contrast Perception.

Distinct visual processing networks for foveal and peripheral visual fields

Top-down Attention is Facilitati Ve, but Not Obligatory, in Perceptual Learning to Reduce Sensory Eye Dominance

Perceived direction of motion determined by adaptation to static binocular images.

From Binocular Input Correlation to Disparity Tuning and Ocular Dominance in Cortex