P1.16-35 Sleeve Lobectomy Versus Pneumonectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, a Cumulative Updated Meta-Analysis
Z. Guo,X. Chen,H. Pan,W. Liang,J. He,Y. Hu,F. Wang,D. He,W. Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.1004
IF: 20.121
2018-01-01
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Abstract:Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is an appealing alternative to pneumonectomy (PN) for central or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of SL versus PN for NSCLC through cumulative meta-analysis. A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies reporting both postoperative and survival outcomes of SL and PN was performed through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library electronic databases from inception to April 2018 A total of 9153 patients (SL: 3658, PN: 5495) from thirty-two studies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for hazard ratio (HR), postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity, local recurrence, and overall survival. PN was inferior to SL in terms of hazard ratio (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.59 to 0.75, I2=56%). Lower postoperative mortality was found in SL group (OR=0.45, 95% CI=0.36 to 0.56, I2=0.0%). While SL and PN showed no significant difference in local recurrence (OR=0.86, 95% [CI]=0.69 to 1.07, I2=45.0%) or postoperative morbidity (OR=0.92, 95% [CI]=0.78 to 1.09, I2=29.0%). Moreover, the 1-, and 5-years survival rates (1-yr: OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.93 to 2.5, I2=14.0%) (5-yrs: OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.61 to 2.35, I2=52.0%) and survival in patients with pN0 or pN1 at 5-years (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.19 to 2.67, I2=3.0%) in the SL group were significantly higher than that in the PN group. As demonstrated in our cumulative meta-analysis, these effects were consistent over the years. SL could be considered an acceptable alternative to PN for the treatment of NSCLC.