Abstract:Recently, we had reported a synthetic positively charged leucine-rich 14-residue-long antimicrobial peptide (AMP, LL-14: NH3+-LKWLKKLLKWLKKL-CONH2), which was highly active and cytotoxic relative to its valine analogue (VV-14). However, the thermodynamics underlying this differential toxicity and antimicrobial activity was unclear. Understanding the energetics of peptide binding to micelles (simplest membrane mimic, viz., SDS as a bacterial membrane and DPC as a eukaryotic membrane) and the effect of Leu → Val peptide mutations on the stability of the peptide:micelle complexes are of great academic interest and relevant for the rational design of potent and selective AMPs for therapeutic use. Here, we have reported the molecular dynamics free energy simulations that allowed us to quantitatively estimate the strength of peptide discrimination (based on single- or multiple-site Leu/Val mutations in LL-14) by membrane mimetic micelles (SDS and DPC) and decipher the energetics underlying peptide selectivity by micelles. The Leu-containing peptide (LL-14) was found to be preferred for micelle (SDS and DPC) binding relative to its Val analogues (single or multiple Val mutants). The strength of the preference depended on the position of the Leu/Val mutation in the peptide. Surprisingly, the N-terminal LL-14 single mutation (Leu → Val: L1V) was found to fine-tune the electrostatic interactions, resulting in the highest peptide selectivity (ΔΔG ∼ 8 kcal/mol for both SDS and DPC). However, the mechanism of L1V peptide selectivity was distinctly different for SDS and DPC micelles. SDS ensured high selectivity by disrupting the peptide:micelle salt bridge, whereas DPC desolvated the broken-peptide-backbone hydrogen bond in the V1 peptide:micelle complex. Mutations (Leu → Val) in the middle positions of the LL-14 (4th, 7th, 8th, and 11th) were disfavored by the micelles primarily due to the loss of peptide:micelle hydrophobic interactions. Peptides differing at the C-terminal (i.e., L14V) were recognized by SDS micelles (ΔΔG ∼ 4 kcal/mol) by altering peptide:micelle interactions. L14V mutation, on the other hand, did not play any role in the peptide:DPC binding, as no direct interactions between the C-terminal and DPC micelle were observed due to obvious electrostatic reasons. The strength of selectivity favoring LL-14 binding against VV-14 was found to be much higher for DPC micelles (ΔΔG ∼ 25 kcal/mol) relative to SDS micelles (ΔΔG ∼ 19 kcal/mol). The loss of the peptide:micelle hydrophobic contact in response to LL-14 → VV-14 mutation was found to be significantly larger for DPC relative to SDS micelles, resulting in higher discriminatory power for the former. Peptide:SDS salt bridges seemed to prevent the loss of peptide:micelle hydrophobic contact to some extent, leading to weaker selectivity for SDS micelles. High selectivity of DPC micelles provided an efficient mechanism for VV-14 dissociation from DPC micelles, whereas low-selectivity of SDS micelles ensured binding of both LL-14 and VV-14. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which the experimental observations (antimicrobial activity and toxicity) between leucine-rich and valine-rich peptides have been explained by establishing a direct link between the energetics and structures.

Implications of Lipid Monolayer Charge Characteristics on Their Selective Interactions with a Short Antimicrobial Peptide

Structural elucidation upon binding of antimicrobial peptides into binary mixed lipid monolayers mimicking bacterial membranes

Effects of Hydrophobic Amino Acid Substitutions on Antimicrobial Peptide Behavior

Influence of Acyl Chain Saturation on the Membrane-Binding Activity of a Short Antimicrobial Peptide.

Analysis of Piscidin and Lipopolysaccharide Interactions: A Step Towards Characterizing Immunomodulation

Interaction Between Antimicrobial Peptide CM15 and a Model Cell Membrane Affected by CM15 Terminal Amidation and the Membrane Phase State

The effect of tailing lipidation on the bioactivity of antimicrobial peptides and their aggregation tendency

Effect of Leu/Val Mutation on the Energetics of Antimicrobial Peptide:Micelle Binding

Theoretical Insight into the Relationship Between the Structures of Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Actions on Bacterial Membranes.

Single-Molecule Resolution of Antimicrobial Peptide Interactions with Supported Lipid A Bilayers

How do antimicrobial peptides disrupt the lipopolysaccharide membrane leaflet of Gram-negative bacteria?

Amphiphilicity Is a Key Determinant in the Membrane Interactions of Synthetic 14-mer Cationic Peptide Analogues

Structural Disruptions of the Outer Membranes of Gram-Negative Bacteria by Rationally Designed Amphiphilic Antimicrobial Peptides.

Two/three-dimensional Interfacial Properties of the Novel Peptide As a Selective Destroyer of Biomembrane

Effects of Chain Length and Hydrophobicity/charge Ratio of AMP on Its Antimicrobial Activity

Intramembrane Nanoaggregates of Antimicrobial Peptides Play a Vital Role in Bacterial Killing

Ib-AMP4 Insertion Causes Surface Rearrangement in the Phospholipid Bilayer of Biomembranes: Implications from Quartz-Crystal Microbalance with Dissipation.

Cell Selectivity and Interaction with Model Membranes of Val/Arg-Rich Peptides

Unlocking the Specificity of Antimicrobial Peptide Interactions for Membrane-Targeted Therapies

How do Antimicrobial Peptides Interact with the Outer Membrane of Gram-Negative Bacteria? Role of Lipopolysaccharides in Peptide Binding, Anchoring, and Penetration

Antibacterial Activities of Short Designer Peptides: a Link Between Propensity for Nanostructuring and Capacity for Membrane Destabilization.