Technique Introduction of Computed Tomographyguided Interstitial Brachytherapyanda Comparison of Dosimetry with Conventional Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Zhong-Shan Liu,Jie Guo,Yang-Zhi Zhao,Xia Lin,Bing-Ya Zhang,Chu Zhang,Hong-Yong Wang,Lei Yu,Xiao-Jun Ren,Tie-Jun Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/igc.0000000000000929
2017-01-01
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Abstract:ObjectiveWe present a new technique of 3-dimensional computed tomography–guided interstitial (IS) brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer, offering a more advantageous clinical treatment approach.Materials/MethodsInterstitial BT was performed using an applicator combining uterine tandem and metal needles; needles were inserted freehand under real-time 3-dimensional computed tomography guidance. Twenty-eight patients with bulky tumors and/or parametrial extension (tumor size > 5 cm) after external beam radiotherapy received IS BT. Dosimetric outcomes of the IS BT including the total dose (external beam radiotherapy and high dose-rate BT) D90 for the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and D2cc for the organs at risk (OARs) were investigated and compared with a former patient group consisting of 30 individuals who received the conventional intracavitary (IC) BT.ResultsThe mean D90 values for HR-CTV in the IC BT and IS BT groups were 76.9 ± 5.7 and 88.1 ± 3.3 Gy, respectively. Moreover, 85.7% of the patients received D90 for HR-CTV of 87 Gy or greater in the IS BT group, and only 6.7% of the patients received D90 for HR-CTV of 87 Gy or greater in the IC BT group. The D2cc for the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid were 84.7 ± 6.8, 69.2 ± 4.2, and 67.8 ± 4.5 Gy in the IC BT group and 81.8 ± 6.5, 66.8 ± 4.0, and 64.8 ± 4.1 Gy in the IS BT group. The mean number of needles was 6.9 ± 1.4, with a mean depth of 2.9 ± 0.9 mm for each IS BT. Interstitial BT was associated with only minor complications.ConclusionsThe IS BT technique resulted in better dose-volume histogram parameters for large volume tumors (>5 cm) compared with the conventional IC BT and acceptable risk of acute complications in locally advanced cervical cancer and is clinically feasible.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?