Abstract:Remediation of lands contaminated with radionuclides and hazardous chemicals provides an ongoing challenge for many countries. It is particularly problematic for remediation of old industrial sites remaining from World War II and the Cold War. Remediating and restoring large sites is often costly, time-consuming, and involves complex planning and sequencing, as well as consideration of future land use policies. The goal of remediation is to reduce contamination, reduce risk to humans and the environment, and restore land to productive land uses, and ultimately, to sustainability. Often reducing risk to people takes precedence over protecting ecological resources in overall planning, characterization, and execution of remediation strategies. This paper examines when and how stakeholders, including anyone interested and affected by remediation on ecological resources, can become involved in the planning, decision-making, and implementation of remediation. There is a formal process under federal law (e.g. CERCLA) in the US for examining risk to resources, including indicator species. However, there are other informal points during the cleanup process when managers should consider the value of ecological resources, the public may express their concerns for particular ecological resources, and ecologists may provide data and expert advice early in the process as critical decisions are being made about remediation that impact ecological resources. The framework presented in this paper for increasing sustainability of ecological resources has three periods of intervention 1) major decision points, 2) process interdiction points, and 3) remediation action points. Major decision points include site and problem identification, regional ecological resource and local land use practice determination, remediation goals and options determination, and other local issues. Interdiction points include examining remediation options, and in-depth assessments of ecological resources on-site. Remediation action points are aimed at reducing risk to ecological resources during remediation, and include defining the remediation site and buffer, understanding the effects of timing and sequencing of remediation, education of all remediation personnel, and specific suggestions for reducing risk during active remediation. While this framework was developed for Department of Energy remediation sites, it is applicable to brownfields and other contaminated lands world-wide. The overall goal is to provide interested and affected parties with a framework for protecting and enhancing ecological resources during the planning and execution of remediation on contaminated lands.

Targeting Cleanups Towards a More Sustainable Future

Incorporating Life Cycle Assessment with Health Risk Assessment to Select the ‘greenest’ Cleanup Level for Pb Contaminated Soil

Green and Sustainable Remediation: Concepts, Principles, and Pertaining Research

Green and Sustainable Remediation: Past, Present, and Future Developments

Sustainable Remediation and Socio-Environmental Management at Contaminated Sites

Comparative life-cycle sustainability assessment of centralized and decentralized remediation strategies at the city level

Assessing Effects of Site Characteristics on Remediation Secondary Life Cycle Impact with A Generalised Framework

Quantifying Global Impacts to Society from the Consumption of Natural Resources during Environmental Remediation Activities

Strengthening Social-Environmental Management at Contaminated Sites to Bolster Green and Sustainable Remediation Via a Survey.

Sustainable remediation and redevelopment of brownfield sites

A framework for increasing sustainability and reducing risk to ecological resources through integration of remediation planning and implementation

Contaminated Department of Energy facilities and ecosystems: weighing the ecological risks

Identifying long-term health risks associated with environmental chemical incidents

Optimizing the Development of Contaminated Land in China: Exploring Machine-Learning to Identify Risk Markers

Divergence in Stakeholder Perception of Sustainable Remediation

Sustainability: A new imperative in contaminated land remediation

The Adoption of Sustainable Remediation Behaviour in the US and UK: A Cross Country Comparison and Determinant Analysis

Vision 2020: More Needed in Materials Reuse and Recycling to Avoid Land Contamination.

Using a Hybrid LCA Method to Evaluate the Sustainability of Sediment Remediation at the London Olympic Park

Environmental and socio-economic sustainability appraisal of contaminated land remediation strategies: A case study at a mega-site in China.

A paradigm for protecting ecological resources following remediation as a function of future land use designations: a case study for the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site