A warning for Chinese academic evaluation systems: short-term bibliometric measures misjudge the value of pioneering contributions

Xiao-jun Hu,Jian-hong Luo,Ronald Rousseau
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1700569
2018-01-01
Abstract:Publication citation-based research evaluation, even if only in support of peer review, is not everywhere, on every level, or for everyone suitable, because of differences in scientific research, patterns of research output, stages of scientific evolution, and merits-scientific or societal-of scientific results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?