Abstract:Very recently, the DØ Collaboration observed a narrow structure by analyzing theBsπ ± invariant mass spectrum, which was named as the X(5568) [1]. The X(5568) has a massm = 5567.8 ± 2.9(stat)+0.9 −1.9(syst) MeV and widthΓ = 21.9 ± 6.4(stat)+5.0 −2.5(syst) MeV [1]. Its discovery mode indicates that the valence quark component of the X(5568) should belsl̄b̄ (l = u or d). Thus, theX(5568) is a good candidate of the exotic tetraquark state. In the past decades, experimen tal search for the exotic states and the corresponding theoreti cal investigations have been an important research topic of had ron physic (see recent review on the study of the exotic states in Ref. [2]). Under the general tetraquark scheme, there exist two possible configurations for theX(5568), i.e., theB̄K molecular state and a compact tetraquark composed of a diquark and anti-diquark. In Ref. [ 3], Liu et al. studied theB̄K interaction in the framework of chiral perturbative theory. The authors found that the Weinberg-Tomozawa term for the B̄K interaction in the isovector sector is zero [ 3], which shows that the attraction between̄ B andK is not strong. If assigning theX(5568) as thēBK molecular state, the binding energy of the B̄K system should be around 200 MeV. In other words, this B̄K molecular state is a deeply bound state. It is obvious that the study from Ref. [ 3] does not support such a deeply boundB̄K molecular state scenario. We also notice a dynamical study of the interaction between̄ B andK by exchanging theρ andω mesons [ 4]. They did not find a bound state solution for the S-wavēBK system [ 4]. The observation of X(5568) has inspired extensive discus-

Decoding the X(5568) as a Fully Open-Flavor sub[over ¯]d[over ¯] Tetraquark State.

Decoding Thex(5568)as a Fully Open-Flavorsub¯

Can X(5568) Be a Tetraquark State?

X(5568) and Its Partner States

01 13 1 v 2 [ h epp h ] 1 9 A pr 2 01 6 X ( 5568 ) and its partner states

Mass spectra and decays of open-heavy tetraquark states

X(4140) , X(4270) ,

$X(5568)$ and and its partner states

A ug 2 00 6 Analysis of the X ( 1576 ) as a tetraquark state with the QCD sum rules

The $X(4140)$, $X(4270)$, $X(4500)$ and $X(4700)$ and their $cs\bar{c}\bar{s}$ tetraquark partners

X(1576) As Diquark–antidiquark Bound State

The $X(4140)$, $X(4270)$, $X(4500)$ and $X(4700)$ and Their $cs\bar{c}\bar{s}$ Tetraquark Partners

X(4140), X(4270), X(4500), And X(4700) And Their Cs(C)Over-Bar (S)Over-Bar Tetraquark Partners

Analysis of X(1576) As A Tetraquark State with the Qcd Sum Rules

Open-charm tetraquark $$X_c$$ and open-bottom tetraquark $$X_b$$

X 0 ( 2866 ) as a D * K ̄ * molecular state

Open-charm tetraquark candidate: Note on X 0 ( 2900 )

Analysis of the X(1576) as a tetraquark state with the QCD sum rules

Resonance $X(3960)$ as a hidden charm-strange scalar tetraquark

Open-flavor charmed/bottom $sq\bar q\bar Q$ and $qq\bar q\bar Q$ tetraquark states

Understanding the Internal Structures of X(4140), X(4274), X(4500) and X(4700)