Is Surgical Resection Justified For Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus? A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis
Li-Yang Sun,Lei Liang,Jiong-Jie Yu,Ju-Dong Li,Xin-Fei Xu,Wen-Tao Yan,Bing Quan,Jia-He Wang,Zhen-Li Li,Jun Han,Hao Xing,Han Wu,Han Zhang,Zheng Wang,Chao Li,Ming-Da Wang,Mengchao Wu,Feng Shen,Tian Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e16111
IF: 45.3
2018-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e16111 Background: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is very poor. According to the BCLC treatment recommendations, sorafenib or other palliative treatment (PT) is recommended as the first-line therapy when it happens. In real world, however, a significant number of selected patients with HCC and PVTT suffered from surgical resection (SR). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library were searched for studies comparing SR with PT (including TACE, sorafenib, etc.) for HCC with PVTT, which were published before September 2017. Results: 4,810 patients from 7 studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, which divided into the SR group (n = 2,344) and the PT group (n = 2476). When compared with the PT group, the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the 1, 3 and 5-year OS rates of the SR group were 0.56 (95% CI 0.52–0.60, P = 0.03), 0.56 (95% CI 0.53–0.59, P < 0.001) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.54–0.57, P < 0.001). For subgroup analysis, when compared with the mere TACE group, the pooled HR for the 1, 3 and 5-year OS rates of the SR group were 0.54 (95% CI 0.43–0.67, P = 0.81), 0.75 (95% CI 0.65–0.87, P = 0.25) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.67–0.88, P = 0.25). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated SR had better OS than TACE or other palliative therapy for HCC with PVTT. SR may be suitable as the first-line treatment for selected patients with resectable HCC and removable PVTT.