Tracing the Source of Sedimentary Organic Carbon in the Loess Plateau of China: an Integrated Elemental Ratio, Stable Carbon Signatures, and Radioactive Isotopes Approach

Chun Liu,Yuting Dong,Zhongwu Li,Xiaofeng Chang,Xiaodong Nie,Lin Liu,Haibing Xiao,Hassan Bashir
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2016.10.022
IF: 2.655
2017-01-01
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Abstract:Soil erosion, which will induce the redistribution of soil and associated soil organic carbon (SOC) on the Earth's surface, is of critically importance for biogeochemical cycling of essential elements and terrestrial carbon sequestration. Despite the importance of soil erosion, surprisingly few studies have evaluated the sources of eroded carbon (C). This study used natural abundance levels of the stable isotope signature (13C) and radioactive isotopes (137Cs and 210Pbex), along with elements ratio (C/N) based on a two end member mixing model to qualitatively and quantitatively identify the sources of sedimentary OC retained by check dam in the Qiaozigou small watershed in the Loess Plateau, China. Sediment profiles (0-200 cm) captured at natural depositional area of the basin was compared to possible source materials, which included: superficial Loess mineral soils (0-20 cm) from three land use types [i.e., grassland (Medicago sativa), forestland (Robinia pseudoacacia.), shrubland (Prunus sibirica), and gully land (Loess parent material.)]. The results demonstrated that SOC in sediments showed significantly negative correlation with pH (P < 0.01), and positive correlation with soil water content (SWC) (P < 0.05). The sedimentary OC was not derived from grasslands or gullies. Forestland and shrubland were two main sources of eroded organic carbon within the surface sediment (0-60 cm deep), except for that in the 20-40 cm soil layer. Radionuclides analyses also implied that the surface sediments retained by check-dams mainly originated from soils of forestland and shrubland. Results of the two end-member mixing model demonstrated that more than 50% SOC (mean probability estimate (MPE) 50.13% via 13C and 60.53% via C/N) in surface sediment (0-20 cm deep) derived from forestland, whereas subsurface sedimentary SOC (20-200 cm) mainly resulted from shrubland (MPE > 50%). Although uncertainties on the sources of SOC in deep soils exist, the soil organic δ13C and C/N is still an effective indicator for sources of sedimentary organic carbon in the deposition zone in the short term (<10 years).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?