A Novel Homozygous BEST1 Mutation Correlates with Complex Ocular Phenotypes
Xunlun Sheng,Xuejuan Chen,Kanxing Zhao,Yani Liu,Douglas Vollrath,Chen Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.03.043
IF: 14.277
2013-01-01
Ophthalmology
Abstract:The BEST1 gene has been implicated in distinguishable ocular diseases ranging from macular degeneration to nanophthalmos.1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar Homozygous BEST1 mutations were previously associated with several diseases1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar including autosomal-recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), which was characterized by macular degeneration with scattered punctate deposits and accumulation of fluid within and/or beneath the neurosensory retina.2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar The significant clinical heterogeneity associated with BEST1 mutations requires an extensive genetic analysis and comprehensive clinical characterization of patients to better understand genotype–phenotype correlations.We studied a consanguineous Chinese family (Fig 1A, available at http://aaojournal.org) with 5 individuals possessing complex ocular phenotypes. Complete ophthalmic examinations were performed on all family members with the exception of patient II:5, who participated only in our genetic study. All human studies were approved by the local institutional ethical review board in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.Individuals I:1 and I:2 are first-degree cousins and had no history of eye diseases at any point in their lives. Four patients (II:6, II:12, II:13, and III:1) manifested angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) as demonstrated by darkroom gonioscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy, increased intraocular pressure, and increased cup-to-disc ratio. Consistent with ACG, all 4 patients had moderately shortened axial lengths with mild hyperopia. They also had bilateral cortical cataracts, which by patient report developed before the age of 20 years (Table 1 and Fig 2, available at http://aaojournal.org).Fundus examination revealed in all 4 patients characteristic features of ARB including retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) disturbances and scattered punctate yellow-whitish fleck deposits surrounding maculae, and accumulation of fluid in the subretinal and/or intraretinal space at the fovea (Table 1 and Fig 2). Moreover, a significant reduction in the EOG light rise with moderately decreased ERG responses was detected in all patients, implying a primary insult to the RPE.2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar Patient II:5 was unavailable for our clinical reevaluation, but her medical records indicated the development of bilateral ACG, premature cataract and maculopathy by 40 years of age. A total of 13 other family members were examined and had no remarkable ophthalmic findings.To detect the genetic causes of the complicated phenotypes observed in this family, we employed a previously described targeted next-generation sequencing approach to screen 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies for mutations3Chen X.J. Zhao K.X. Sheng X.L. et al.Targeted sequencing of 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies and 10 candidate genes identifies novel and known mutations in patients with various retinal diseases.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 2186-2197Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar in the proband (II:13). A total of 2298 single nucleotide variations and 78 indels were initially detected by next-generation sequencing and, after bioinformatic filtering, 12 variants were validated by Sanger sequencing and evaluated for pathogenicity as previously described.3Chen X.J. Zhao K.X. Sheng X.L. et al.Targeted sequencing of 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies and 10 candidate genes identifies novel and known mutations in patients with various retinal diseases.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 2186-2197Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar By this process, only 1 variant, c.752G>A (p.C251Y) in BEST1, was identified as a putative pathogenic mutation. Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of this variant in all 5 patients in the homozygous state, and in 10 unaffected family members in the heterozygous state (Fig 1A). Of note, patient III:1 is homozygous for the mutation, suggesting that his unaffected father, who is not known to be related to the family, also harbors this variant, presumably owing to a founder effect. This variant is absent in the 3 remaining unaffected family members tested and in 100 unrelated controls, is evolutionarily conserved (Fig 1B) and is predicted to be functionally highly deleterious by the bioinformatic programs PolyPhen-2 (score = 1) and SIFT (score = 0).Because ACG and cataract are very rarely reported in families with ARB, we considered the possibility that these additional phenotypes in affected family members were associated with mutations in other genes genetically linked to BEST1. To localize such candidate genes, we performed homozygosity mapping across all of chromosome 11 using 20 microsatellite markers and 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The homozygous region shared by all patients is flanked by D11S4109 and rs7130122 (Fig 1A), and as expected, includes BEST1. We next analyzed the genes within the homozygous region using the OMIM online database (http://omim.org/) and found only 2 genes, TMEM138 and TMEM216, which may be associated with ocular anomalies. Sanger sequencing of the coding regions of these genes did not detect any putative pathogenic mutations. Thus, homozygosity for the p.C251Y mutation of BEST1 is very likely the cause of the entire spectrum of phenotypes observed in the family.The mechanism by which p.C251Y causes the phenotypes we have described is unknown. Bestrophin-1 encoded by BEST1 is a RPE protein hypothesized to function as a Ca2+ activated Cl− channel, or a regulator of ion transport.1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar Previously described biallelic BEST1 mutations associated with ARB are probably loss-of-function mutations.2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar, 4Pomares E. Bures-Jelstrup A. Ruiz-Nogales S. et al.Nonsense-mediated decay as the molecular cause for autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in two unrelated families.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 532-537Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar p.C251Y is located in the fifth transmembrane spanning helix (TM5),5Milenkovic V.M. Rivera A. Horling F. Weber B.H. Insertion and topology of normal and mutant bestrophin-1 in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 1313-1321Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar very close to the extracellular surface (Fig 1C). Interestingly, all mutants previously found in TM5 and TM6, 2 symmetric helices, caused dominant phenotypes (Fig 1C). These dominant-acting mutations were hypothesized to generate unclear dysfunction rather than loss of BEST1 function.1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar p.C251Y may have complex pathogenic effects including both loss-of-function and dysfunction, leading to more complicated phenotypes than other known ARB-associated alleles.ACG and hyperopia were previously reported in a small fraction of patients with ARB,2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar but were not recognized as traits associated with ARB owing to their low frequency and lack of sufficient familial evidence. Patients with dominant MRCS syndrome (microcornea, retinal dystrophy, cataract, and posterior staphyloma) caused by heterozygous BEST1 mutations can develop premature cataracts, but ours is the first description of which we are aware of cataracts consistently found in patients with ARB. In this relatively large consanguineous family with recessive disease, the cosegregation of p.C251Y with a coherent ocular phenotype in all 5 patients strongly suggests a new constellation of traits associated with BEST1 homozygous mutations: ARB, ACG, hyperopia, and cataracts. Our extensive genetic analyses likely rule out other genetic components in this family. The BEST1 gene has been implicated in distinguishable ocular diseases ranging from macular degeneration to nanophthalmos.1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar Homozygous BEST1 mutations were previously associated with several diseases1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar including autosomal-recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), which was characterized by macular degeneration with scattered punctate deposits and accumulation of fluid within and/or beneath the neurosensory retina.2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar The significant clinical heterogeneity associated with BEST1 mutations requires an extensive genetic analysis and comprehensive clinical characterization of patients to better understand genotype–phenotype correlations. We studied a consanguineous Chinese family (Fig 1A, available at http://aaojournal.org) with 5 individuals possessing complex ocular phenotypes. Complete ophthalmic examinations were performed on all family members with the exception of patient II:5, who participated only in our genetic study. All human studies were approved by the local institutional ethical review board in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Individuals I:1 and I:2 are first-degree cousins and had no history of eye diseases at any point in their lives. Four patients (II:6, II:12, II:13, and III:1) manifested angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) as demonstrated by darkroom gonioscopy, ultrasound biomicroscopy, increased intraocular pressure, and increased cup-to-disc ratio. Consistent with ACG, all 4 patients had moderately shortened axial lengths with mild hyperopia. They also had bilateral cortical cataracts, which by patient report developed before the age of 20 years (Table 1 and Fig 2, available at http://aaojournal.org). Fundus examination revealed in all 4 patients characteristic features of ARB including retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) disturbances and scattered punctate yellow-whitish fleck deposits surrounding maculae, and accumulation of fluid in the subretinal and/or intraretinal space at the fovea (Table 1 and Fig 2). Moreover, a significant reduction in the EOG light rise with moderately decreased ERG responses was detected in all patients, implying a primary insult to the RPE.2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar Patient II:5 was unavailable for our clinical reevaluation, but her medical records indicated the development of bilateral ACG, premature cataract and maculopathy by 40 years of age. A total of 13 other family members were examined and had no remarkable ophthalmic findings. To detect the genetic causes of the complicated phenotypes observed in this family, we employed a previously described targeted next-generation sequencing approach to screen 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies for mutations3Chen X.J. Zhao K.X. Sheng X.L. et al.Targeted sequencing of 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies and 10 candidate genes identifies novel and known mutations in patients with various retinal diseases.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 2186-2197Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar in the proband (II:13). A total of 2298 single nucleotide variations and 78 indels were initially detected by next-generation sequencing and, after bioinformatic filtering, 12 variants were validated by Sanger sequencing and evaluated for pathogenicity as previously described.3Chen X.J. Zhao K.X. Sheng X.L. et al.Targeted sequencing of 179 genes associated with hereditary retinal dystrophies and 10 candidate genes identifies novel and known mutations in patients with various retinal diseases.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54: 2186-2197Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar By this process, only 1 variant, c.752G>A (p.C251Y) in BEST1, was identified as a putative pathogenic mutation. Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of this variant in all 5 patients in the homozygous state, and in 10 unaffected family members in the heterozygous state (Fig 1A). Of note, patient III:1 is homozygous for the mutation, suggesting that his unaffected father, who is not known to be related to the family, also harbors this variant, presumably owing to a founder effect. This variant is absent in the 3 remaining unaffected family members tested and in 100 unrelated controls, is evolutionarily conserved (Fig 1B) and is predicted to be functionally highly deleterious by the bioinformatic programs PolyPhen-2 (score = 1) and SIFT (score = 0). Because ACG and cataract are very rarely reported in families with ARB, we considered the possibility that these additional phenotypes in affected family members were associated with mutations in other genes genetically linked to BEST1. To localize such candidate genes, we performed homozygosity mapping across all of chromosome 11 using 20 microsatellite markers and 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The homozygous region shared by all patients is flanked by D11S4109 and rs7130122 (Fig 1A), and as expected, includes BEST1. We next analyzed the genes within the homozygous region using the OMIM online database (http://omim.org/) and found only 2 genes, TMEM138 and TMEM216, which may be associated with ocular anomalies. Sanger sequencing of the coding regions of these genes did not detect any putative pathogenic mutations. Thus, homozygosity for the p.C251Y mutation of BEST1 is very likely the cause of the entire spectrum of phenotypes observed in the family. The mechanism by which p.C251Y causes the phenotypes we have described is unknown. Bestrophin-1 encoded by BEST1 is a RPE protein hypothesized to function as a Ca2+ activated Cl− channel, or a regulator of ion transport.1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar Previously described biallelic BEST1 mutations associated with ARB are probably loss-of-function mutations.2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar, 4Pomares E. Bures-Jelstrup A. Ruiz-Nogales S. et al.Nonsense-mediated decay as the molecular cause for autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy in two unrelated families.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53: 532-537Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar p.C251Y is located in the fifth transmembrane spanning helix (TM5),5Milenkovic V.M. Rivera A. Horling F. Weber B.H. Insertion and topology of normal and mutant bestrophin-1 in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.J Biol Chem. 2007; 282: 1313-1321Crossref PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar very close to the extracellular surface (Fig 1C). Interestingly, all mutants previously found in TM5 and TM6, 2 symmetric helices, caused dominant phenotypes (Fig 1C). These dominant-acting mutations were hypothesized to generate unclear dysfunction rather than loss of BEST1 function.1Marmorstein A.D. Cross H.E. Peachey N.S. Functional roles of bestrophins in ocular epithelia.Prog Retin Eye Res. 2009; 28: 206-226Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar p.C251Y may have complex pathogenic effects including both loss-of-function and dysfunction, leading to more complicated phenotypes than other known ARB-associated alleles. ACG and hyperopia were previously reported in a small fraction of patients with ARB,2Burgess R. Millar I.D. Leroy B.P. et al.Biallelic mutation of BEST1 causes a distinct retinopathy in humans.Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82: 19-31Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar but were not recognized as traits associated with ARB owing to their low frequency and lack of sufficient familial evidence. Patients with dominant MRCS syndrome (microcornea, retinal dystrophy, cataract, and posterior staphyloma) caused by heterozygous BEST1 mutations can develop premature cataracts, but ours is the first description of which we are aware of cataracts consistently found in patients with ARB. In this relatively large consanguineous family with recessive disease, the cosegregation of p.C251Y with a coherent ocular phenotype in all 5 patients strongly suggests a new constellation of traits associated with BEST1 homozygous mutations: ARB, ACG, hyperopia, and cataracts. Our extensive genetic analyses likely rule out other genetic components in this family. Supplementary dataTable 1Clinical Features of 4 Patients in Family J90Patient IDGenderAge (yrs)BCVARefraction (D)IOP⁎The IOP refers to the value measured at the first visit. (mm Hg)ACD (mm)GonioscopyAL (mm)CataractCDRFundusERGEOGII:6M50OD: 6/60OS: CFOD: +3.50OS: +3.00OD: 13.0OS: 38.6OD: 1.65OS: 1.64OU:AC > 270°OD: 21.18OS: 21.29Bilateral, developed before 20 year of ageOD: 0.5OS: 0.8OU: Yellowish fleck deposits and RPE atrophy in maculae, SRF at foveaReduced rod and cone ERG by ∼50%Nearly absent light riseII:12F38OD: LPOS: 6/60OD: +1.75OS: +1.50OD: 34.5OS: 25.2OD: 1.45OS: 1.41OU:AC > 270°OD: 21.44OS: 21.30Bilateral, developed before 20 year of ageOD: 0.9OS: 0.9OU: Yellowish fleck deposits at maculae, macular edemaNAReduced light rise by ∼90%II:13M35OD: 6/40OS: 6/60OD: +2.75OS: +3.50OD: 13.8OS: 44.1OD: 1.59OS: 1.62OU:AC > 270°OD: 21.34OS: 20.89Bilateral, developed before 20 year of ageOD: 0.6 OS: 0.9OU: Macular edema, yellowish deposits and RPE atrophy in the maculae and midperipheryReduced rod and cone ERG by ∼50%Reduced light rise by ∼80%III:1M33OD: 6/60OS: 6/60OD: +1.75OS: +2.50OD: 22.2 OS: 19.7OD: 2.43OS: 2.06OD: AC > 180°OS: AC < 90°OD: 21.54OS: 21.36Bilateral, developed before 20 years of ageOD: 0.6OS: 0.3OU: Yellowish fleck deposits and RPE atrophy in maculae, macular edemaReduced rod and cone ERG by ∼50%Reduced light rise by ∼80%ACD = anterior chamber depth; AC = angle closure; AL = axial length; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; CF = counting fingers within 30 cm; IOP = intraocular pressure; LP = light perception; NA = not available; OD = right eye; OS = left eye; OU = both eyes; SRF = subretinal fluid; VL = vitelliform lesion. The IOP refers to the value measured at the first visit. Open table in a new tab Figure 2Clinical evaluations of 2 patients, II:13 (upper left) and II:6 (upper right). A–D, Ultrasound biomicroscopy revealed shallow anterior chamber and angle-closure. E–H, Color funduscopy indicated macular degeneration with yellowish-white deposits (black arrows), and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) pigmentary atrophy (white asterisk) in both patients. Optic disc pale with increased cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) were observed in both eyes of II:13 (E, F) and left eye of II:6 (H). I–L, Optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination demonstrated dramatic bilateral macular cystoid edema of II:13 (I, J), and moderate accumulation of fluid in the subretinal space with RPE detachment at the fovea in II:6 (K, L). White arrows indicate fluid accumulation.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) ACD = anterior chamber depth; AC = angle closure; AL = axial length; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; CF = counting fingers within 30 cm; IOP = intraocular pressure; LP = light perception; NA = not available; OD = right eye; OS = left eye; OU = both eyes; SRF = subretinal fluid; VL = vitelliform lesion.