An Approach to Primary Tumors of the Upper Cervical Spine With Spondylectomy Using a Combined Approach: Our Experience With 19 Cases.

Feng Wei,Zhongjun Liu,Xiaoguang Liu,Liang Jiang,Gengting Dang,Peter G Passias,Miao Yu,Fengliang Wu,Lei Dang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001007
IF: 3.241
2018-01-01
Spine
Abstract:Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To examine the link between major complications, surgical techniques, and perioperative care in the intralesional spondylectomy of the upper cervical spine. Summary of Background Data. Spondylectomy has been demonstrated to prolong cancer-free survival in many patients with locally aggressive spinal tumors. However, the challenging nature of this surgical procedure and the potential for severe complications often limit its application in the upper cervical spine. Methods. Nineteen patients with primary upper cervical tumors were treated with spondylectomy from March 2005 to August 2009, using either the anterior-posterior or posterior-anterior approach. Anterior procedures were transmandibular, transoral, or high retropharyngeal. Anterior reconstructions were performed in plates with iliac crest strut grafts, plates with mesh cages, and Harms mesh cages alone. Occipitocervical fixation was performed with Halo-vest application for postoperative immobilization. Results. Vertebral artery injuries occurred unilaterally in 5 cases intraoperatively: 4 occurred in the anterior approach of anterior-posterior procedures. Fusion was achieved in 9 patients with intact internal instrumentation. Fusion with the anterior construct in a tilted position occurred in 3 patients, all of whom underwent anterior-posterior procedures with Halo-vest immobi-lization for less than 1 month. Nonunion occurred in 3 cases after the posterior-anterior procedure because of anterior bone graft absorption. Prolonged Halo-vest immobilization maintained postoperative stability. Failure of internal instrumentation occurred in 3 cases. Anterior construct dislocation and severe tilting occurred in 2 cases after the anterior-posterior procedure. Five patients had a local recurrence. All recurrent lesions were malignant tumors and occurred in regions where surgical exposure was inadequate with incomplete excision. Conclusion. The order of the surgical approach is a critical determinant of complications, fusion rates, choice of surgical technique, and reconstruction methods. The postoperative use of a Halo-vest is recommended. Local recurrence is associated with tumor malignancy and inadequate excision margin.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?