Rapid and Simultaneous Measurement of Phosphorus Metabolite Pool Size Ratio and Reaction Kinetics of Enzymes in Vivo.

Sang-Young Kim,Wei Chen,Dost Ongur,Fei Du
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25744
IF: 4.4
2017-01-01
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:PurposeThe metabolites phosphocreatine (PCr), adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and in-organic phosphate (Pi) are biochemically coupled. Their pool sizes, assessed by their magnetization ratios, have been extensively studied and reflect bioenergetics status in vivo. However, most such studies have ignored chemical exchange and T-1 relaxation effects. In this work, we aimed to extend the T-1(nom) method to simultaneously quantify the reaction rate constants as well as phosphorus metabolite pool size ratios under partially relaxed conditions. Materials and MethodsModified Bloch-McConnell equations were used to simulate the effects of chemical exchanges on T-1 relaxation times and magnetization ratios among PCr, -ATP, and Pi. The T1nom method with iteration approach was used to measure both reaction constants and metabolite pool size ratios. To validate our method, in vivo data from rat brains (N=8) at 9.4 Tesla were acquired under two conditions, i.e., approximately full relaxation (TR=9 s) and partial relaxation (TR=3 s). We compared metabolite pool size ratios and reaction constants before and after correcting the chemical exchange and T-1 relaxation effects. ResultsThere were significant errors in underestimation of PCr/ATP by 12 % (P=0.03) and overestimation of ATP/Pi ratios by 14 % (P=0.04) when not considering chemical exchange effects. These errors were minimized using our iteration approach, resulting in no significant differences (PCr/ATP, P=0.47; ATP/Pi, P=0.81) in metabolite pool size ratios and reaction constants between the two measurements (i.e., short versus long TR conditions). ConclusionOur method can facilitate broad biomedical applications of P-31 magnetization saturation transfer spectroscopy, requiring high temporal and/or spatial resolution for assessment of altered bioenergetics. Level of Evidence: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:210-221.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?